24.04.2013 Views

The bronze age and the Celtic world - Universal History Library

The bronze age and the Celtic world - Universal History Library

The bronze age and the Celtic world - Universal History Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHRONOLOGY 171<br />

be relatively modern, while <strong>the</strong> hiatus between that period <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> neolithic <strong>age</strong> has<br />

disappeared. Thanks to <strong>the</strong> work of Baron de Geer" we have some fotmdation for a<br />

chronology of this period, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> results of this work have long been made known to<br />

Enghsh readers by Professor Sollas.' <strong>The</strong>re seems to be httle doubt but that <strong>the</strong> pause<br />

in <strong>the</strong> retreat of <strong>the</strong> Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian ice by Lake Ragunda, which de Geer has dated at<br />

5000 B.C., may be equated, as has been shown by Brooks,^ with <strong>the</strong> Daun stadium of<br />

Penck.* <strong>The</strong> Fenno-Sc<strong>and</strong>ian moraines, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, can only be equated with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Biihl advance which took place towards <strong>the</strong> close of Magdalenian times, <strong>and</strong> this<br />

gives us a date of 7000 to 7500 B.C. for Magdalenian. <strong>The</strong> Goti-glacial moraines<br />

seem to indicate <strong>the</strong> second Wiirm maximum, <strong>and</strong> SoUas' estimate for <strong>the</strong> interval<br />

seems eminently reasonable <strong>and</strong> has been adopted here ; <strong>the</strong> first maximum of <strong>the</strong><br />

Wiirm seems represented by <strong>the</strong> Dani-glacial line.<br />

<strong>The</strong> later dates depend, by a series of synchronisms, on those ascertained from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Egyptian monuments, <strong>and</strong> it is unfortunate that on this point authorities differ.<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> various schools of thought has been well <strong>and</strong> fairly<br />

summarised by Dr. Hall ;' <strong>the</strong> two great protagonists are Professor Fhnders Petrie* <strong>and</strong><br />

Dr. Edouard Meyer,' whose system has been adopted with slight modifications by<br />

Professor Breasted.' For this reason <strong>the</strong>re are alternative systems in vogue for <strong>the</strong><br />

period preceding 1580 B.C.<br />

Since so many great authorities, well acquainted with <strong>the</strong> facts <strong>and</strong> well able to<br />

interpret <strong>the</strong>m, differ as to <strong>the</strong> result, one, who is not an Egyptologist, can decide<br />

between <strong>the</strong>m only by testing <strong>the</strong> application of both systems in his own field of study.<br />

Having appUed this test to both schemes, I have no hesitation in accepting <strong>the</strong> latter<br />

or shorter chronology, for by <strong>the</strong> former I find that <strong>the</strong> earUer periods would be more<br />

prolonged than <strong>the</strong> evolution of <strong>the</strong> culture warrants. I have <strong>the</strong>refore, throughout this<br />

work used dates based on those given for Egypt by Professor Breasted. This, of course,<br />

does not apply to Mesopotamian dates.<br />

' Geer (1896), (1912). J Hall (1913) 15-30-<br />

» Sollas (191 1) 395-397. ' Petrie (1906) ch. xii.<br />

3 Brooks (1921). ^ Meyer (1904).<br />

4 Penck & Bruckner (1909). 8 Breasted (1912).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!