ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX II Survey proforma for Entomopathogenic fungi Date: ________________ Sample No.:__________________ I. 1. Season 2. Place 3. Taluka 4. District 5. Region/zone 6. Ecosystem II. 1. Crop 2. Cropping system 3. Soil type 4. Soil temperature (°C) 5. Air temperature (°C) 6. Relative humidity (%) III. Host/Pest No. of observed No. infected 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Methodology 1. Field crops : 10 m² area/plot and 3 such plots will be observed at each location 2. Plantations: 10 plants at random will be observed Infected cadavers will be collected in the vials giving sample number Date: Signature IDENTIFICATION Identified as: ____________________________________________________________ By : ____________________________________________________________ Date: Signature
Maharashtra Association for the Cultivation of Science AGHAKAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE (An Autonomous Grant-in-aid Institute under the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India) No. 3/59/2003/Adm./ 1794 Dr. (mrs.) Alaka Pande Scientist E2 & In-charge Mycology & Plant Pathology, Division of Plant Sciences Sub: Identification repost on three fungal cultures Ref: Your letter No. ENT/DBT/131/02-03dt. 05/02/2003 Dear r. Patil, February 19, 2003 I am pleased o inform, you that we have completed the identification work of the above said material and such a brief repost of the same is being enclosed herewith for your kind perusal and further use. We are thankful to you for the payment of Rs. 210/- as identification charges for which our accounts section has passed on a receipt bearing No. 31992 dt. 10/02/2003. Encl.: a/a Thanking you, Dr. R. K. PATIL Entomologist (Oilseeds) Department of Agricultural Entomology University of Agricultural Sciences DHARWAD 580 005 Yours faithfully (Alaka Pande)
Page 1 and 2:
ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF E
Page 3 and 4:
Chapter No. I INTRODUCTION C O N T
Page 5 and 6:
Contd….. Table No. Title 14. Spor
Page 7 and 8:
Contd….. Table No. Title 39. Per
Page 9 and 10:
Plate No. LIST OF PLATES Title 1. M
Page 11 and 12:
I.INTRODUCTION The increased use of
Page 13 and 14:
II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE The variou
Page 15 and 16:
The entomopathogenic fungi so far i
Page 17 and 18:
Table 1. Contd….. Sl. No. Insect
Page 19 and 20:
Milner et al. (2002) studied the ef
Page 21 and 22:
25°C for sporulation and biomass p
Page 23 and 24:
Pathogencity of various strains/iso
Page 25 and 26:
Gopalkrishnan and Mohan (2000) test
Page 27 and 28:
necessary serial dilutions under ph
Page 29 and 30:
Sl. No. Table 2. Details of differe
Page 31 and 32:
3.9 EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT FORMULA
Page 33 and 34:
Fig. 1. Mycopathogens of insect pes
Page 35 and 36:
Table 5. Contd….. Month/s visited
Page 37 and 38:
Table 5. Contd….. Month/s visited
Page 39 and 40:
Table 5. Contd….. Mycosis noticed
Page 41 and 42:
Totally eight isolates of N. rileyi
Page 43 and 44:
Metarhizium anisopliae Vertucillium
Page 45 and 46:
Ma 1 (Dharwad) Ma2 (Dharwad) Ma 3 (
Page 47 and 48:
Table 8. Mortality caused by the is
Page 49 and 50:
Helicoverpa armigera Dimond Black M
Page 51 and 52:
Plate 5. The moratality of Hlelicov
Page 53 and 54:
Table 11. Total biomass production
Page 55 and 56:
Table 12. Total biomass production
Page 57 and 58:
Table 14. Sporulation of Metarhiziu
Page 59 and 60:
Mean spore yield x 10 8 /g 25 20 15
Page 61 and 62:
Among the non-grain substrates, the
Page 63 and 64:
Mean spore yield x 10 4 /g 35 30 25
Page 65 and 66:
Sl. No. Table 19. Effect of fungici
Page 67 and 68:
Per cent inhibition 100 90 80 70 60
Page 69 and 70:
Sl. No. Table 21. Effect of insecti
Page 71 and 72:
Out of nine insecticides, endosulfa
Page 73 and 74:
Sl. No. Table 23. Effect of weedici
Page 75 and 76: Days after storage Table 25. Persis
Page 77 and 78: Table 26. Survival of Metarhizium a
Page 79 and 80: Table 28. Survival of Metarhizium a
Page 81 and 82: Sl. No. Table 29. Survival of Metar
Page 83 and 84: Sl. No. Table 30. Survival of Metar
Page 85 and 86: Per cent germination 90 80 70 60 50
Page 87 and 88: Sl. No. Table 33. Survival of Verti
Page 93 and 94: 4.9 PATHOGENICITY OF Verticillium l
Page 95 and 96: Sl. No. Table 39. Per cent mortalit
Page 97 and 98: Culture grown on rice grains Harves
Page 99 and 100: Tr. No. Table 41. Per cent reductio
Page 101 and 102: Tr. No. Table 43. Per cent reductio
Page 103 and 104: The fungal spray at higher dosage (
Page 105 and 106: Table 46. Effect of wild types and
Page 107 and 108: The hyphal and conidial characters
Page 109 and 110: In an earlier experiment, bagasse w
Page 111 and 112: M. anisopliae exhibited rapid reduc
Page 113 and 114: higher mortality of aphids. The com
Page 115 and 116: 14. Oil formulations proved better
Page 117 and 118: CHARNLEY, A.K. AND ST. LEGER, R.J.,
Page 119 and 120: IGNOFFO, C.M., MARSTON, N.L., HOSTE
Page 121 and 122: MULLER, E.J., 2000, Control of the
Page 123 and 124: ST LEGER, R.J., BUTT, T.M., STAPLES
Page 125: APPENDIX I Mean monthly weather dat
Page 129: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF E
show all

ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?