15.05.2013 Views

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER VI.<br />

164r)-lB50.<br />

Connecticut imposes a Eiver Tariff. — Purchase <strong>of</strong> Saylnook Fort. ^ William Pvnchou<br />

refuses to pay the Duty. — The Commissioners <strong>of</strong> the United Colonies sustain Con-<br />

necticut. — Sprinj^field's Case in Detail. — Massachusetts imposes Retaliatory Duties.<br />

— Connecticut removes the lliver Duties on <strong>Springfield</strong> Goods. — Floods <strong>and</strong> Local<br />

Incidents. — Taxes. — Miles Morgan. — The Freeman's Oath. — Troul)le as to Swine.<br />

— <strong>Town</strong> Oi-ilers. — IVnclion's Court.<br />

Outside affairs again demauded the attention <strong>of</strong> the frontier plan-<br />

tation ; <strong>and</strong> he who had antagonized the cohjny down the river was<br />

again placed where he must renew the battle or retire from the valley.<br />

During the five years beginning with 1645 <strong>Springfield</strong> <strong>and</strong> Hartford<br />

kept up a running sword-play over the custom duties on the Connect-<br />

icut river. It was the first tariff war in New Engl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> finally<br />

involved all <strong>of</strong> the colonies. It would not be c<strong>and</strong>id to charge that<br />

Connecticut was urged into this contest <strong>by</strong> a special hostility to<br />

<strong>Springfield</strong> ; because the colony was nursing a commercial ambition,<br />

<strong>and</strong> was bound to further her material interests <strong>by</strong> all legitimate<br />

means. However, it will be seen b}' the temper <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

charges fornuilated at Hartford that the bitterness was not lessened<br />

<strong>by</strong> a neighborly feeling towards <strong>Springfield</strong>.<br />

Near the close <strong>of</strong> the year 1()44 Connecticut had bargained for<br />

the fort at Saybrook, Mr. Fenwick, the owner, agreeing to accept<br />

certain duties, including '2d. per bushel upon exported grain passing<br />

the fort, <strong>and</strong> fid. per hundred ,upon biscttit. There was also an annual<br />

tax put upon liogs <strong>and</strong> cattle, to be paid to Fenwick ; all <strong>of</strong> these<br />

tributes to continue ten years, when the fort was to become the abso-<br />

lute property <strong>of</strong> Connecticitt. Officers were stationed at Windsor,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!