15.05.2013 Views

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SPRINGFIELD, <strong>1636</strong>-<strong>1886</strong>. 449<br />

feeling between the armory administration <strong>and</strong> the citizens <strong>of</strong> vSpring-<br />

field. This was the year also when Col. J. W. Ripley was made<br />

superintendent. There was almost immediately a loud call for Rip-<br />

ley's removal. His discipline was <strong>of</strong> the strict military order, <strong>and</strong><br />

regulations like forbidding the reading <strong>of</strong> books or newspapers<br />

in the shops during working hours occasioned bitter resentment.<br />

The armorers, in fact, objected to a military man on general princi-<br />

ples. This unpopularity <strong>of</strong> a whig superintendent delighted the loco<br />

focos ; <strong>and</strong> well they might feel pleased, for the disaffection was<br />

great enough to bring about a draw in the November elections for<br />

representatives, the whig abolitionists contributing to this result <strong>by</strong><br />

running a "liberty" ticket. The political confusion had been in-<br />

creased <strong>by</strong> the failure <strong>of</strong> the whigs, in April, to elect town <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

There were no less than four tickets in the field, — whig, loco<br />

foco, independent, <strong>and</strong> abolition.<br />

In the spring <strong>of</strong> 1842 the armorers sent a committee to Washing-<br />

ton to protest against the "system <strong>of</strong> military superintendence."<br />

The claim was made at that time that not only the discipline <strong>of</strong> the<br />

men had deteriorated, but that it was less economical to place a mili-<br />

tary man over the armory. There had been an uncordial feeling in<br />

the armory toward the army <strong>of</strong>ficers, running back to 1833, when an<br />

application for more wages for the armorers was referred to a commis-<br />

sion <strong>of</strong> three armory <strong>of</strong>ficers, which promptly recommended a reduc-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> wages. This recommendation was not followed. During the<br />

sickness <strong>of</strong> Colonel Lee, in 1833, Lieutenant-Colonel Talcott had a<br />

short trial as superintendent, <strong>and</strong> his $12.31 musket <strong>and</strong> $15,000<br />

deficit did not aid the cause <strong>of</strong> military superintendency very<br />

much. In 1834 a civilian, John Robb, paid <strong>of</strong>f the old debt,<br />

made a musket for $11.05, <strong>and</strong> showed a surplus at the close <strong>of</strong> the<br />

year. In 1835 the musket was reduced to $10.94, <strong>and</strong> when he was<br />

superseded, in 1841, he had a surplus <strong>of</strong> $42,000. The return to a<br />

military superintendency had been recommended <strong>by</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong><br />

Ordnance, <strong>of</strong> which Lieutenant-Colonel Talcott was president.<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!