15.05.2013 Views

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[<br />

SPRINGFIELD, <strong>1636</strong>- JSS6. 253<br />

Young as he was, however, he developed the very genms <strong>of</strong> diplomacy,<br />

lu any new project <strong>of</strong> the advancement <strong>of</strong> the church he was quite<br />

inclined first to consult those most hostile to liim. It is a great pity<br />

that the recoixls are so silent upon the career <strong>of</strong> this remarkable man.<br />

He evidently had a broad, stalwart common sense Avhicli kept him<br />

from extremes.<br />

Hardly was he under way in his ney^^ work when Whitefield<br />

appeared in this valley. While no bigot, Mr. Breck proved him-<br />

self a firm champion <strong>of</strong> his creed. He had evident!}' little de-<br />

sire to see his people crying out in hysterical felicitations over an<br />

anticipated eternity <strong>of</strong> bliss. It was remarked along tlie valley that<br />

Mr. Breck rather snubbed young ]Mr. nVhitetield, for the latter was<br />

yet under thirty. Mr. Whitefield's journeyiugs greatly stimulated<br />

the wonderful revivals in religion Avhich were breaking over the<br />

valley. That Mr. Breck distrusted the effect <strong>of</strong> special religious re-<br />

vivals may be safely accepted as a fact. In later years one <strong>of</strong> his<br />

congregation openly said that Mr. Breck opposed the "late stir" in<br />

religion.<br />

It is <strong>of</strong> passing interest to note that our contentious friend Rev.<br />

Thomas Clap rode with Jonathan EdAvards to Boston in 1743, <strong>and</strong><br />

that afterward Mr. Clap circulated the curious repoil that Edwards<br />

understood Whitefield to say that lie had a design <strong>of</strong> " turning out <strong>of</strong><br />

their places the greater part <strong>of</strong> the clergy <strong>of</strong> New Engl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

supplying their pulpits with ministers from Engl<strong>and</strong>, Scotl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Irel<strong>and</strong>." Mr. Edwards publicly denied making such a charge, but<br />

]Mr. Clap reiterated it; <strong>and</strong> there the matter rests.<br />

The discourtesy charged upon ]\Ir. Breck toward the English<br />

Methodist is undoubtedly overdrawn. There is no sufficient reason to<br />

doul )t the statement made in the accounts <strong>of</strong> Whiteheld's first Ameri-<br />

can journey, that he preached in <strong>Springfield</strong> in 1740 on his way with<br />

Jonathan Edwards from Northampton to East Windsor. If Mr.<br />

Breck had refused the use <strong>of</strong> the meeting-house, <strong>and</strong> Whitefield had<br />

really preached, say, at West <strong>Springfield</strong>, it seems that the circum-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!