15.05.2013 Views

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

196 SPRINGFIELD, <strong>1636</strong>-1SS6.<br />

provisioual committee resumed its functions over Enfield. In 1692<br />

this connnittee, or ratlier John Pynehon <strong>and</strong> Jouatlian Burt, its only<br />

surviving members, surrendered the books <strong>and</strong> records to Enfield,<br />

with their best wishes for the success <strong>of</strong> the new town.<br />

In October, 1684, John Pynehon had granted to Isaac Meacham<br />

the privilege <strong>of</strong> building a fulling-mill at the mouth <strong>of</strong> Freshwater<br />

brook, a part <strong>of</strong> the consideration being the " yearly wel fulling &<br />

thickening <strong>of</strong> five <strong>and</strong> twentie yards <strong>of</strong> Cloth."<br />

The survey <strong>of</strong> the boundary line between the two colonies, made in<br />

1642, <strong>and</strong> known as the Woodward <strong>and</strong> Saffery line, placed Enfield in<br />

Massachusetts. In 1648 Massachusetts ordered that all the l<strong>and</strong> east<br />

<strong>of</strong> the river at a point twenty poles below the warehouse belonged to<br />

<strong>Springfield</strong>. It Avas many years before the dispute as to jurisdiction<br />

was settled. In 1713 it was agreed that each colony should retain<br />

jurisdiction over the towns they had settled, <strong>and</strong> that the boundary<br />

should run due west from the Connecticut river, from the Wood-<br />

ward <strong>and</strong> Saffery line, <strong>and</strong> that reparation should be made b}^ con-<br />

veying <strong>by</strong> deed unimproved l<strong>and</strong>s, in cases where one colony gained<br />

from the other. It was found that Massachusetts had appropriated<br />

over 100,000 acres <strong>of</strong> Connecticut l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>by</strong> this survey. The survey<br />

was wrong, but ^Massachusetts paid upon that basis for many years.<br />

The towns <strong>of</strong> Woodstock, Somers, Suttield, <strong>and</strong> Enfield continued to<br />

protest against being under the Massachusetts jurisdiction, <strong>and</strong> even<br />

appealed to the king ;<br />

they finally gained their point.<br />

H. S. Sheldon, <strong>of</strong> Suffield, speaking <strong>of</strong> the break in the boundary,<br />

as appears now upon the map, says : —<br />

Simsbury <strong>and</strong> Westfield retained their ancient boundaries, being first incor-<br />

porated, leaving west <strong>of</strong> the mountain a strip <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> about one mile in width be-<br />

tween tlie two, for Sufiield. Our proprietors mourned the loss <strong>of</strong> tliat part <strong>of</strong><br />

tlieir grant secured <strong>by</strong> Simsbur}-, as it was supposed to be ricli in mines <strong>of</strong><br />

copper <strong>and</strong> iron. Tliey were consoled <strong>by</strong> tlie Massachusetts Court, in 1732,<br />

granting tliem a township six miles square (now Bl<strong>and</strong>ford) as an equivalent.<br />

They sold it to Christopher J. Lawton, <strong>of</strong> Suffield, receiving but little therefor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!