15.05.2013 Views

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

Springfield 1636-1886, History of Town and City, by Mason A. Green ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

21G SPRINGFIELD, <strong>1636</strong>-<strong>1886</strong>.<br />

detected the l<strong>and</strong>slide. But it was more than a neglect to bow to<br />

the dictum <strong>of</strong> the ministers. In this town the fashion was early set<br />

to choose laymen rather than ministers as leaders, <strong>and</strong> yet the change<br />

was quite as marked here as elsewhere.<br />

This is no treatise on theology, but the liistor}' <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Springfield</strong><br />

people cannot be written <strong>and</strong> its theology ignored. The Puritan<br />

fathers held that the churches should be made up <strong>of</strong> " visible saints"<br />

only. Baptized persons were at first, at least, subject to reprim<strong>and</strong>s<br />

<strong>and</strong> discipline even before entering into full fellowship. The church-<br />

membership <strong>of</strong> persons who grew up, married, <strong>and</strong> presented their<br />

children for baptism without themselves going to the communion<br />

caused disquietude. To illustrate : Brother A. is a member in full<br />

communion, <strong>and</strong> presents his son B. for baptism. B., when grown<br />

up, neglects to make a public declaration <strong>of</strong> repentance, <strong>and</strong> thus is<br />

never admitted to the Lord's supper, but he in turn presents his son<br />

C. for baptism. The question was whether the Abrahamic covenant<br />

would be potent with tlie infant C. if baptized, <strong>by</strong> virtue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

church membership <strong>of</strong> (xr<strong>and</strong>father A. The New Engl<strong>and</strong> divines<br />

disagreed, <strong>and</strong> there were eventually enough non-pr<strong>of</strong>essing church-<br />

members <strong>and</strong> enough infant C.'s presented for baptism to disturb the<br />

deepest faith. A ministerial assembly called <strong>by</strong> the New P^ngl<strong>and</strong><br />

Legislatures met at Boston in 1657, decided that the sons B. could<br />

present their children C. for baptism provided the B.'s were not scan-<br />

dalous, <strong>and</strong> solemnly aver the covenant in their own persons. This<br />

was given, however, " with clue reverence for any godly learned that<br />

may dissent."<br />

These half-way covenanters were not allowed to come to the Lord's,<br />

supper. The churches were thus made up <strong>of</strong> those in an intermedia-<br />

tory or probationary state <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> those in full communion. The<br />

ranks <strong>of</strong> the former class were fast growing, <strong>and</strong> quite possibly led<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the ministers to review <strong>and</strong> restate their belief as to church-<br />

membership. Rev. Solomon Stoddard, <strong>of</strong> Northampton, was the first,<br />

or at least the most prominent, minister who felt compelled to break

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!