02.06.2013 Views

String Theory Demystified

String Theory Demystified

String Theory Demystified

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xii <strong>String</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> Demystifi ed<br />

happening, and some have even proposed that microscopic black holes could be<br />

produced. Again, you could imagine having extra dimensions without string theory,<br />

so discoveries like these would not prove string theory. However, they would be<br />

major indirect evidence in its favor. You will learn in this book that string theory<br />

predicts the existence of extra dimensions, so any evidence of this has to be taken<br />

as a serious indication that string theory is on the right path.<br />

<strong>String</strong> theory has lots of problems—it’s a work in progress. This time is akin to<br />

living in the era when the existence of atoms was postulated but unproven and<br />

skeptics abounded. There are lots of skeptics out there. And string theory does seem<br />

a bit crazy—there are several versions of the theory, and each has a myriad of<br />

particle states that have not been discovered (however, note that transformations<br />

called dualities have been discovered that relate the different string theories, and<br />

work is underway on an underlying theory believed to exist called M-theory). The<br />

only serious competitor right now for string theory is loop quantum gravity. I want<br />

to emphasize I am not an expert, but I once took a seminar on it and to be honest I<br />

found it incredibly distasteful. It seemed so abstract it almost didn’t seem like<br />

physics at all. It struck me more as mathematical philosophy. <strong>String</strong> theory seems a<br />

lot more physical to me. It makes outlandish predictions like the existence of extra<br />

dimensions, but general relativity and quantum theory make predictions that defy<br />

common sense as well. Eventually, all we can do is hope that experiment and<br />

observation will resolve the controversy and help us decide if loop quantum gravity<br />

or string theory is on the right track. Regardless of what our tastes are, since this is<br />

science we will have to follow where the evidence leads.<br />

This book is written with the intent of getting readers started in string theory. It<br />

is intended for self-study and to make the real textbooks on the subject more<br />

accessible after you finish this one.<br />

But make no mistake: This is not a “popular” book—it is written for readers who<br />

want to learn string theory.<br />

The presentation has been simplified in some places. I have left out important<br />

topics like path integration, differential forms, and partition functions that are<br />

necessary for advanced study. Even so, there has been an attempt to give the reader<br />

a good overview of the basics of string physics. Unlike other introductory texts, I<br />

have decided to include a discussion of superstrings. It is more complicated, but my<br />

feeling is if you understand the bosonic case it’s not too much of a leap to include<br />

superstrings. What you really need as background for this is some exposure to Dirac<br />

spinors. If you don’t have this background, read Griffiths’ Elementary Particles or<br />

try Quantum Field <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>Demystified</strong>. The bottom line is that string theory is an<br />

advanced topic, so you will need to have the background before reading this book.<br />

Specifically, from mathematics you need to know calculus, linear algebra, and partial<br />

and ordinary differential equations. It also helps to know some complex variables,<br />

and my book Complex Variables <strong>Demystified</strong> is being released at about the same

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!