EuroSDR Projects - Host Ireland

no [4]
Remark: could be useful to get rough idea of individual strengths and weaknesses, but not useful to
derive meaningful ranking of different results; not enough detail to discriminate – e.g., eye joins
broken lines
4. For semi-automatic approaches we propose to define the expected quality, i.e., level of
detail, precision, and completeness, and then compare the timings for operator interaction
and computing time. The achieved results would be evaluated automatically to make sure
that the demanded quality is actually reached. Does this make sense?
yes [6]
no [0]
Remark: not only total interaction time is relevant, but also number and duration of breaks between
operator's activities; in addition the time duration of interactions and automatic processing should be
recorded in a table
Please, add in the field below any additional remarks
In order to compare different supervised methods, the same images should be used with the same
training areas; when will the data be ready
Thank you for your collaboration
266