EuroSDR Projects - Host Ireland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3 REFERENCE DATA ................................................................................................................ 192 3.1 Generation of Reference Data........................................................................................... 192 3.2 Accounting for Different Acquisition Times.................................................................... 193 3.3 Reference Maps ................................................................................................................ 193 4 ANALYSIS................................................................................................................................. 195 4.1 Basic Information ............................................................................................................. 195 4.2 Evaluation Procedure........................................................................................................ 195 4.2.1 Areal Areas ............................................................................................................ 195 4.2.2 Linear Objects........................................................................................................ 197 4.2.3 Qualitative Comparison ......................................................................................... 198 5 RESULTS OF PHASE I ........................................................................................................... 199 5.1 Test Site Copenhagen ....................................................................................................... 199 5.1.1 Areal and Linear Objects ....................................................................................... 199 5.1.2 Qualitative Comparison ......................................................................................... 201 5.1.3 Summary – Copenhagen ........................................................................................ 201 5.2 Test Site Fjärdhundra........................................................................................................202 5.2.1 Areal and Linear Objects ....................................................................................... 202 5.2.2 Qualitative Comparison ......................................................................................... 204 5.2.3 Summary – Fjärdhundra......................................................................................... 204 5.3 Test Site Oberpfaffenhofen............................................................................................... 205 5.3.1 Areal and Linear Objects ....................................................................................... 205 5.3.2 Qualitative Comparison ......................................................................................... 207 5.3.3 Summary – Oberpfaffenhofen................................................................................ 208 5.4 Test Site Trudering ........................................................................................................... 208 5.4.1 Areal and Linear Objects ....................................................................................... 208 5.4.2 Qualitative Comparison ......................................................................................... 211 5.4.3 Summary – Trudering ............................................................................................ 211 6 CONCLUSION – PHASE I ...................................................................................................... 212 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................................................ 213 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 213 H. Mayer, E. Baltsavias and U. Bacher: AUTOMATED EXTRACTION, REFINEMENT, AND UPDATE OF ROAD DATABASES FROM IMAGERY AND OTHER DATA ........................ 217 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... 219 1 MOTIVATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................... 219 1.1 Motivation ........................................................................................................................ 219 1.2 Implementation................................................................................................................. 220
2 QUESTIONNAIRES................................................................................................................. 221 2.1 Summary of responses to the Questionnaire for Producers of Road Data ........................ 221 2.2 Summary of responses to the Questionnaire for Researchers and Manufactures ............. 222 3 TEST DATA AND EVALUATION CRITERIA .................................................................... 225 4 APPROACHES AND EVALUATION OF RESULTS .......................................................... 226 5 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 230 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................... 237 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................................................................................... 239 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 239 APPENDICES................................................................................................................................... 243 APPENDIX 1: PROJECT PROPOSAL ......................................................................................... 243 APPENDIX 2: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PRODUCERS OF ROAD DATA.............................. 249 APPENDIX 3: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RESEARCHERS AND MANUFACTURERS ......... 257 APPENDIX 4: GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE APPROACHES........................... 267 APPENDIX 5: README FILE ...................................................................................................... 271 APPENDIX 6: DOCUMENTATION BY BEUMIER AND LACROIX...................................... 275 APPENDIX 7: DOCUMENTATION BY HEDMAN AND HINZ ............................................... 277 APPENDIX 8: DOCUMENTATION BY ZHANG AND COULOIGNER ................................. 279
Page 1 and 2: European Spatial Data Research Nove
Page 3 and 4: PRESIDENT 2006 - 2008: Stig Jönsso
Page 5 and 6: H. Kaartinen and J. Hyyppä: EVALUA
Page 7: 4.3.1 Data and study area..........
Page 13 and 14: Abstract The objective of the EuroS
Page 15 and 16: The analysis of the structural qual
Page 17 and 18: Figure 2-3: Hermanni test site. Fig
Page 19 and 20: Espoonlahti Hermanni Senaatti Photo
Page 21 and 22: 2.2 Reference Data 2.2.1 Field Meas
Page 23 and 24: Used data Time use Laser Aerial Gro
Page 25 and 26: Step 3: Import to CCModeler Figure
Page 27 and 28: Figure 3-4: Sequence of manual phot
Page 29 and 30: Figure 3-8: Workflow of laser scann
Page 31 and 32: Figure 3-11: Parametric building mo
Page 33 and 34: Each group of connected pixels clas
Page 35 and 36: Figure 3-18: Topological points and
Page 37 and 38: Detailed Description (Letters refer
Page 39 and 40: assumption is made: the two longest
Page 41 and 42: Figure 3-25: A 3D building model wi
Page 43 and 44: ICC used the same methods as Nebel
Page 45 and 46: where p75th is the value at the 75
Page 47 and 48: CyberCity Stuttgart Hamburg IGN ICC
Page 49 and 50: CyberCity Hamburg Stuttgart IGN ICC
Page 51 and 52: Height Cyber- City Hamburg Stuttgar
Page 53 and 54: Height Cyber- City Stuttgart IGN IC
Page 55 and 56: Height Cyber- City Stuttgart IGN IC
Page 57 and 58: Height Cyber- City HamburgStuttgart
Page 59 and 60:
Height Cyber- City HamburgStuttgart
Page 61 and 62:
All targets Eaves Ridges Height IGN
Page 63 and 64:
CyberCity achieved a good quality i
Page 65 and 66:
Point density, shadowing of trees a
Page 67 and 68:
Height accuracy IQR [m] 1.6 1.4 1.2
Page 69 and 70:
All Cyber- Ham- ICC laser+ Nebel+ I
Page 71 and 72:
All Cyber- HamStutt- ICC laser+ Neb
Page 73 and 74:
In building length determination (F
Page 75 and 76:
degrees, std 6.3 degrees). In Senaa
Page 77 and 78:
5 Discussion and Conclusions It can
Page 79 and 80:
References Alharthy A. and Bethe, J
Page 81 and 82:
Fraser, C.S., Baltsavias, E. and Gr
Page 83 and 84:
Khoshelham K., 2004. Building Extra
Page 85 and 86:
Sequeira, V., Ng, K., Wolfart, E.,
Page 87 and 88:
Index of Figures Figure 2-1: Senaat
Page 89:
Index of Tables Table 2-1: Aerial i
Page 92 and 93:
90 Senaatti by Delft. Wireframe mod
Page 94 and 95:
92 Espoonlahti by IGN, with and wit
Page 96 and 97:
94 Senaatti by IGN, with and withou
Page 98 and 99:
96 Hermanni by Aalborg.
Page 100 and 101:
98 CyberCity ICC laser+aerial ICC l
Page 102 and 103:
100 IGN FOI outlines Nebel+Partner
Page 105 and 106:
Difference Images, Whole Test Site,
Page 107 and 108:
Difference Images, Whole Test Site,
Page 109 and 110:
Difference Images, Modelled Buildin
Page 111 and 112:
Difference Images, Modelled Buildin
Page 113:
EuroSDR-Project Commission 2 “Ima
Page 116 and 117:
2 Project highlights The project Ch
Page 118 and 119:
116 Feature Characteristics Object
Page 120 and 121:
New are those combinations that ind
Page 122 and 123:
120 Figure 4-1: Orthophotomosaic fr
Page 124 and 125:
4.1.2 Segmentation The first step o
Page 126 and 127:
124 Class Features Vegetation Ratio
Page 128 and 129:
4.1.4 Change map As the results of
Page 130 and 131:
Two types of changes were assigned
Page 132 and 133:
130 Figure 4-11: Evaluation of chan
Page 134 and 135:
132 Figure 4-13: Orthophotos of stu
Page 136 and 137:
different villages were identified
Page 138 and 139:
136 Figure 4-16: Change maps of Swi
Page 140 and 141:
spectral reflectance. Shadows (blac
Page 142 and 143:
140 Figure 4-19: Change map of Germ
Page 144 and 145:
Figure 4-21: Diagnostics as given b
Page 146 and 147:
144 Automatic Accepted Rejected Hum
Page 148 and 149:
4.4.2 Segmentation, classification
Page 150 and 151:
differentiated very well. The chang
Page 152 and 153:
150 Figure 4-31: Ultracam real-colo
Page 154 and 155:
152 Figure 4-35: Classification of
Page 156 and 157:
154 Figure 4-38: Subset of change m
Page 158 and 159:
5 Conclusions and Outlook In this p
Page 161:
Annex 1 EuroSDR Change Detection Wo
Page 164 and 165:
What is the impact of changing spat
Page 167:
Annex 2 Paper presented at IGARSS05
Page 170 and 171:
covering 2 x 2 km with reference da
Page 172 and 173:
170 Red roof Bright object 0 20 40
Page 175:
Annex 3 EuroSDR CD Workshop Nicosia
Page 178 and 179:
176 method 1 indicates land cover c
Page 181:
Annex 4 Comments on change map by B
Page 184 and 185:
enzen mehr zu erwarten. Doch laut
Page 187 and 188:
Abstract The EuroSDR “Sensor and
Page 189 and 190:
2 Test Sites and Test Data The test
Page 191 and 192:
Figure 3: Data set Fjärdhundra, ag
Page 193 and 194:
The map of Sweden is only available
Page 195 and 196:
3.2 Accounting for Different Acquis
Page 197 and 198:
4 Analysis 4.1 Basic Information In
Page 199 and 200:
4.2.2 Linear Objects Since it is no
Page 201 and 202:
5 Results of Phase I 5.1 Test Site
Page 203 and 204:
5.1.2 Qualitative Comparison In add
Page 205 and 206:
140,0 120,0 100,0 80,0 60,0 40,0 20
Page 207 and 208:
5.3 Test Site Oberpfaffenhofen 5.3.
Page 209 and 210:
140,0 120,0 100,0 80,0 60,0 40,0 20
Page 211 and 212:
cies in analysis. The following fig
Page 213 and 214:
5.4.2 Qualitative Comparison The ra
Page 215 and 216:
Acknowledgments We thank all partic
Page 217:
Index of Tables Table 1: Contest Ph
Page 221 and 222:
Abstract Roads are important object
Page 223 and 224:
overview over the whole area. We ra
Page 225 and 226:
m and above no longer plays an impo
Page 227 and 228:
3 Test Data and Evaluation Criteria
Page 229 and 230:
and straight enough. • Markus Ger
Page 231 and 232:
Name (best) Test area Completeness
Page 233 and 234:
• ADS40_1 and 2: Results for both
Page 235 and 236:
• Ikonos1_Sub1: This image shows
Page 237 and 238:
Figure 7: Ikonos3_Sub1 - Bacher; co
Page 239 and 240:
Finally, we want to note some impor
Page 241 and 242:
load nor response time for anybody
Page 243:
Zhang, C., 2004. Towards an Operati
Page 246 and 247:
objects, and their cooperation with
Page 248 and 249:
Belgium, provided by their NMCAs. H
Page 250 and 251:
Possibly only parts of images will
Page 252 and 253:
How many people are employed in you
Page 254 and 255:
7. What is the average time differe
Page 256 and 257:
- what is the degree of completenes
Page 259 and 260:
Appendix 3: Questionnaire for Resea
Page 261 and 262:
If others please specify: 2. What d
Page 263 and 264:
Complex crossings (more than 4 road
Page 265 and 266:
Combination of a) or b) with c) [0]
Page 267 and 268:
If yes, using: DTM and / or [2] D
Page 269 and 270:
Appendix 4: General Characteristics
Page 271:
Most important features for practic
Page 274 and 275:
IKONOS The images come from the SI
Page 277:
Appendix 6: Documentation by Beumie
Page 281 and 282:
Appendix 8: Documentation by Zhang
Page 283 and 284:
LIST OF OEEPE/EuroSDR OFFICIAL PUBL
Page 285 and 286:
25 Ducher, G.: Test on Orthophoto a
show all

EuroSDR Projects - Host Ireland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?