29.07.2013 Views

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

from infrastructure funds, but they are non-traditional in trying to<br />

mitigate some of the technology risk to the extent possible. There<br />

will be an attempt to set up a form of project financing, at least for<br />

the first or second plant, basically to get the company on its feet, to<br />

get it up and running. Then you demonstrate to the more traditional<br />

financiers, the large-capital bank providers, that this is feasible on a<br />

large scale as you roll out your plants with a more traditional capital<br />

structure. But it’s something that people are starting to look at and<br />

to really come up with creative structures because it does not really<br />

fit in your classic project finance or your classic growth equity play.<br />

Mace: Just a reflection on private or financial investors, people<br />

who’d like to play in the sector but who don’t necessarily have inhouse<br />

the industrial or the technological insights. I think that for<br />

them, the technological landscape for second generation must look<br />

fairly confusing right now. They’ve got a number of technologies<br />

being proposed to them, some using biological routes, some using<br />

various chemical routes. And I think it must be rather daunting<br />

for those providers of funding to make up their minds right now in<br />

terms of what really works and what doesn’t.<br />

Forer: Going forward, what is the role of today’s leading oil and<br />

gas corporations?<br />

Mace: Clearly, the first role is to embrace our responsibility in<br />

terms of facing up to and meeting the challenges. And the first<br />

challenge for the energy world is energy security — where it is all<br />

going to come from. I believe we’re talking about roughly doubling<br />

the amount of primary energy used in 2050 versus today. Then,<br />

of course, at the same time, it’s got to be low carbon; we have to<br />

mitigate climate change. So the number one role is to be proactive<br />

and really embrace our responsibility there.<br />

Biofuels are clearly a big part of the response and, as a matter of<br />

fact, they are among the very few credible solutions in the area of<br />

transport. So the role of oil and gas operators is to facilitate the<br />

adoption of biofuels done well, as I certainly would not argue that<br />

all biofuels are equal. And not only to facilitate their introduction<br />

and their acceptance, but also to bring those technologies to market<br />

because of our historically successful track record of delivering<br />

large projects — of successfully delivering large capital investments.<br />

We need to promote the technologies that we see as having the<br />

ability to be winners in the long term. We need to help in selecting<br />

them and in bringing them to market in a very material way since<br />

we are not talking about biofuels being 1% or even 5% of transport<br />

energy. Our vision is that biofuels have the potential to be between<br />

10% and 20% of global transport fuel energy by 2030.<br />

102 <strong>Beyond</strong> borders <strong>Global</strong> <strong>biotechnology</strong> <strong>report</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

“The oil and gas folks are extremely<br />

important because they have the capital<br />

and the capability to build out these<br />

new technologies. They have a lot of<br />

the capability to improve production<br />

processes. And they’re used to solving<br />

problems.”<br />

Roe: I think it’s interesting to look at and to watch the various points<br />

of injection, if you will, or intervention into this space by the big oil<br />

and gas companies. Invariably, without their involvement, this would<br />

be a nearly impossible task.<br />

That said, there is a real paradigm shift here. It is very difficult<br />

for companies whose foundation is a mindset that the future<br />

production of transportation energy revolves around oil reserves<br />

to start thinking about a piece of land that in perpetuity produces<br />

a feedstock material and doesn’t have a finite lifetime or life cycle.<br />

This is a real shift, and I think some of the energy companies,<br />

some of the oil and gas companies, see that differently, approach<br />

it very differently and are more or less progressive on some sort of<br />

a continuum.<br />

But clearly, whether the paradigm shift occurs completely or<br />

not, it must occur eventually. Because ultimately, success will be<br />

very difficult to achieve as long as we have internal combustion<br />

engines and liquid transportation fuels that are part of that<br />

process, unless the current incumbent oil and gas companies are<br />

very strong participants.<br />

Haywood: I think you’re beginning to see the incumbents embrace<br />

the future. But it’s important to remember that they’ve got their<br />

businesses to run. Recently, when demand destruction hit, they<br />

took a hit like everyone else did, particularly on the refining side.<br />

Refining has been a brutal industry to be in for the last year. But<br />

the oil and gas folks are extremely important because they have<br />

the capital and the capability to build out these new technologies.<br />

They have a lot of the capability to improve production processes.<br />

And they’re used to solving problems. So I think they’re going<br />

to be important from an investment perspective and also in the<br />

development of these technologies as we go forward.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!