29.07.2013 Views

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ontario-based firms raised over US$400<br />

million, more than any other province (due<br />

principally to the Biovail financing discussed<br />

above), followed by Quebec firms, which<br />

raised US$161 million. In a surprising show<br />

of strength, Alberta companies raised<br />

US$84 million, while British Columbia’s<br />

firms raised US$67 million.<br />

There was a similar surprise in the cross-city<br />

analysis of capital raised. While Montreal,<br />

Vancouver and Toronto continued to lead<br />

the pack, companies in Calgary raised<br />

US$84 million, third only to Montreal and<br />

Toronto. The increase in funding from<br />

Calgary can be attributed to Oncothyreon<br />

and ResVerlogix, which were both very<br />

active in 2009 and accounted for 56% of the<br />

funding in Calgary.<br />

Australia<br />

In Australia, the amount of capital raised by<br />

publicly traded companies through equity<br />

financings rebounded sharply, from A$119<br />

million (US$106 million) in 2008 to A$307<br />

million (US$229 million) in 2009. While<br />

this represents an encouraging recovery<br />

over the prior year, the amount raised in<br />

2009 is still the second-lowest in any year<br />

since 2002 and is about 40% lower than<br />

the annual average seen between 2005<br />

and 2007. The capital markets remained<br />

closed to biotech companies looking to<br />

issue shares for the first time, and there<br />

were no IPOs of Australian companies<br />

during the year.<br />

As in many markets, the bulk of the<br />

money went to a relatively small group of<br />

companies. Five firms — Avexa, Bionomics,<br />

Pharmaxis, QRxPharma and Starpharma<br />

Holdings Limited — accounted for more<br />

than half the public equity capital raised<br />

during the year. Melbourne-based Avexa<br />

led the financing totals for the year, with<br />

A$41 million (US$31 million) raised in<br />

Australian biotech public equity raised, 2002–09<br />

IPO<br />

A$m<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Source: Ernst & Young, Bioshares and company annual <strong>report</strong>s<br />

several different offerings. Following the<br />

failed merger with Progen in early 2009,<br />

Avexa turned to its shareholders and<br />

raised A$17 million (US$12.7 million)<br />

in a rights issue followed by an A$11<br />

million (US$8.2 million) private placement<br />

and a A$15 million (US$11.2 million)<br />

oversubscribed shareholder purchase<br />

plan. These funds were utilized to advance<br />

the company’s apricitabine (ATC) Phase III<br />

study in HIV patients. The A$15.6 million<br />

(US$11.6 million) raised by Starpharma<br />

through a private placement to<br />

institutional and sophisticated individual<br />

investors is to be used to finance the<br />

completion of Phase III clinical trials.<br />

Other markets<br />

Follow-on offerings<br />

For noteworthy financing events in<br />

other markets, refer to the Country<br />

profiles section.<br />

Number of transactions<br />

Getting creative<br />

Challenging times have typically inspired<br />

creativity in biotech companies, so it is not<br />

surprising that companies have shown an<br />

increased interest in other sources of capital<br />

as the usual funding sources have become<br />

increasingly constrained. This has ranged<br />

from using asset sales and alliances to raise<br />

capital to exploring funding options from<br />

disease foundations and government grants.<br />

Economic development incentive programs<br />

(see A closer look on the next page) provide<br />

another potential source of capital, as state<br />

and local governments — pressures on their<br />

own coffers notwithstanding — are often still<br />

interested in developing their local<br />

biotech clusters.<br />

Looking ahead<br />

The amount of investment capital available<br />

for the biotech industry will depend on<br />

the pace of economic recovery in the<br />

73<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!