29.07.2013 Views

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

Beyond Borders: Global biotechnology report 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Growth rate<br />

Canada<br />

Behind the numbers: the impact of the Genentech acquisition on US biotech financial results<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

-5%<br />

-10%<br />

-15%<br />

-20%<br />

-25%<br />

-30%<br />

8%<br />

-13%<br />

2008 2009 2009 adjusted<br />

for Genentech<br />

acquisition<br />

In Canada, the number of public companies<br />

declined significantly, from 72 companies<br />

in 2008 to 64 companies in 2009 — an 11%<br />

reduction. A number of firms were acquired<br />

or went out of business in the current<br />

downturn, and there was a complete lack of<br />

IPOs to replenish the stock. On the private<br />

company side, the number of firms declined<br />

9%, from 286 in 2008 to 260 in 2009.<br />

The revenues of publicly traded biotech<br />

companies in Canada grew by 9% over the<br />

prior year. While this may appear to be better<br />

than the 9% decline seen a year earlier, the<br />

revenue drop in 2008 was actually driven<br />

by the acquisition of four large Canadian<br />

companies by foreign firms. Normalizing for<br />

those acquisitions, the growth rate in Canada<br />

for 2008 was actually 26% — significantly<br />

higher than the acquisition-adjusted growth<br />

rate in 2009, which is 11%.<br />

As in the US and Europe, public companies<br />

in Canada have had to engage in significant<br />

cost cutting to survive. These efforts have<br />

delivered results on the bottom line, where<br />

the publicly traded industry’s net loss fell an<br />

astounding 94%, from US$1.2 billion in 2008<br />

to only US$70 million in 2009 — the industry’s<br />

lowest overall net loss in the last decade.<br />

This improvement on the bottom line had<br />

three distinct drivers. First, companies have<br />

cut back their expenditures in the current<br />

financial climate. Second, a number of<br />

loss-making companies have been acquired<br />

or ceased operations. Third, significant writeoffs<br />

of intangible assets over the last few<br />

years have abated as very few companies<br />

now carry any sizable intangible assets on<br />

their balance sheets.<br />

60 <strong>Beyond</strong> borders <strong>Global</strong> <strong>biotechnology</strong> <strong>report</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

10%<br />

2008 2009 2009 adjusted<br />

for Genentech<br />

acquisition<br />

Revenues R&D<br />

Source: Ernst & Young<br />

Chart shows year-on-year change in aggregate financial results of US publicly traded biotech companies.<br />

21%<br />

-24%<br />

-13%<br />

Unfortunately, much of the cost cutting has<br />

come at the expense of R&D spending, which<br />

fell 44% in 2009. R&D is the driver of future<br />

growth in this sector, and this sharp decline<br />

could have long-term repercussions for the<br />

Canadian industry.<br />

Despite the cost-cutting measures, there was<br />

no appreciable improvement in the industry’s<br />

survival index. While the amount of capital<br />

raised by Canadian firms rose significantly<br />

during the year, the vast majority of these<br />

funds went to a small group of companies,<br />

leaving 57% of companies with less than one<br />

year of cash on hand.<br />

Boosted by an overall stock market recovery,<br />

the industry’s market cap surged 56% during<br />

the year. Even with this recovery, however,<br />

the industry only partially made up for the<br />

ground it lost in 2008, when the industry<br />

lost 61% of its market value.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!