29.07.2013 Views

Numerical modeling of waves for a tsunami early warning system

Numerical modeling of waves for a tsunami early warning system

Numerical modeling of waves for a tsunami early warning system

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Numerical</strong> <strong>modeling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>waves</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>tsunami</strong> <strong>early</strong> <strong>warning</strong> <strong>system</strong><br />

the frequency domain correspond to the same number <strong>of</strong> angular frequencies<br />

ω, ranging between 2π10 −1 rad/s and 2π10 3 rad/s. By taking advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

the fact that the results in the positive semi-axis <strong>of</strong> the frequency are complex<br />

conjugates <strong>of</strong> those along the negative semi-axis, only half <strong>of</strong> the solution is<br />

sought <strong>for</strong>.<br />

The ‘indirect’ procedure is applied to calculate the source term to be<br />

used in the wave-maker boundary condition (left boundary), being known<br />

the elevation <strong>of</strong> the free surface at the points where the gauges are located.<br />

The experimental results at the gauge 1 are used to estimate the source term,<br />

while the results at gauges 2, 3, 4 and 5 are compared with the numerical<br />

model results. The first step is to solve the field equation (3.29) together with<br />

the boundary conditions described in section 3.1.2, where a unit source term<br />

is imposed at the wave-maker boundary condition (3.38). Consequently the<br />

unit solution N ′ (x, ω) is obtained in the computational domain; the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> this variable at the point corresponding to the gauge 1 is referred to as<br />

N ′ 1(ω). The records obtained at the gauge 1 are then used to calculate the<br />

variable N1 (ω) as the Fourier Trans<strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the experimental time series <strong>of</strong><br />

the surface elevation. Since during the experiments, part <strong>of</strong> the generated<br />

<strong>waves</strong> were reflected at the right boundary, the records obtained at the gauge<br />

1 suffer <strong>of</strong> reflected and re-reflected (at the left boundary) <strong>waves</strong>. However it<br />

was easy to estimate the time at which the reflected <strong>waves</strong> had affected the<br />

records and to smoothly set the signal to zero, in order to avoid generation<br />

<strong>of</strong> spurious <strong>waves</strong> in the numerical test. The source term S (ω) tobeusedin<br />

the boundary condition is then calculated by an equation equivalent to the<br />

(3.50). The results in the whole computational domain are given by<br />

N (x, ω) =S (ω) N ′ (x, ω) . (4.1)<br />

The water surface elevation η(x, t) is obtained using the Inverse Fast<br />

Fourier Trans<strong>for</strong>m with respect to the time, <strong>for</strong> each computational point <strong>of</strong><br />

interest, such as those at the position <strong>of</strong> the wave gauges.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> one representative test are presented. The water depth<br />

used in the experiment is <strong>of</strong> 0.23 m and the box released with the bottom<br />

placed at the still water level. Figure 4.3 shows the surface elevation, η (t),<br />

measured by the five gauges (dashed red lines) and those resulting from the<br />

numerical simulations with the present model (solid black lines).<br />

The <strong>waves</strong> typically present first a crest, then a trough; this is due to the<br />

Università degli Studi di Roma Tre - DSIC 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!