Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 5 – INVOLVEMENT WITH POLICE AND PROBATION<br />
102<br />
All the courts before which Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> appeared in relation to the offences<br />
were Magistrates’ courts, except for the manslaughter. Magistrates’ courts hear<br />
cases of crimes committed in their particular district. Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was convicted<br />
of offences in Easington (Peterlee) court three times, in South Durham court twice,<br />
in Durham court once, in Newcastle upon Tyne court once, in Hartlepool court four<br />
times, in Teesside court once, in <strong>North</strong> Durham court twice and in Sedgefield court<br />
once.<br />
The sentencing varied. For a group of seven offences she received a Hospital Order -<br />
that is, she was ordered to be detained in a psychiatric hospital. The courts imposed<br />
three separate “probation orders” known as CROs/ COs. On two occasions (prior to<br />
the killing) she had knives forfeited and destroyed. She was conditionally discharged<br />
on eight occasions, (four of which were part of the same group of convictions). She<br />
was, variously, fined (small amounts), ordered to pay compensation and detained for<br />
one day (the longest custodial sentence she actually received until the conviction for<br />
manslaughter).<br />
Including the offences for which she was charged, the police, in information collated<br />
for the trial, noted that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> had, in a period of eight years ending in<br />
January 2006, a total of seventy-four ‘interactions’ with Durham Constabulary. She<br />
made large numbers of nuisance 999 calls, often when seriously intoxicated, about<br />
which she was warned. She made numerous complaints about Mr Hilton and<br />
allegations about his behaviour to her, (as well as making unfounded allegations<br />
against others) and on five occasions <strong>report</strong>ed that she had attacked or killed<br />
Mr Hilton, or threatened to do so. There were complaints from others about the<br />
disturbances she caused. In 2004 in particular her behaviour was especially disturbed.<br />
At one point the policeman concerned was moved to record that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> and<br />
Mr Hilton were two people in a very volatile relationship and the police feared that<br />
“one day one will seriously assault the other.”<br />
On very many of the occasions when the police had contact with Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> they<br />
noted that she was seriously intoxicated.<br />
The police response<br />
DS1 investigated the homicide; until then he had had no dealings with Louisa<br />
<strong>Ovington</strong>. As part of his <strong>investigation</strong>s he commissioned detailed ‘timelines” of Louisa<br />
<strong>Ovington</strong>’s involvement with the police from 1998 and of relevant community (health<br />
and social care) information from 1996. He chaired the Domestic Homicide Review.