05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

f) Use of “talking therapies”<br />

CHAPTER 9 – CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

The panel could find no evidence that anyone ever did any significant work<br />

with Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> regarding her childhood experiences. She appears not to<br />

have been offered psychological help during her childhood; she did not engage<br />

with psychologists whilst in hospital; she did no formal work on this in the<br />

community.<br />

The panel accepts that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was reluctant to engage in psychological<br />

work. Nonetheless, the panel considers that significant opportunities to attempt<br />

treatment of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> were missed:<br />

• She could have been referred to CAMHS following the death of her mother.<br />

• She saw a private counsellor when she attended Peterlee College, but no<br />

attempts were made to refer her for counselling through the <strong>NHS</strong> when she<br />

began to come into contact with adult mental health services.<br />

• There was little opportunity for her to engage in psychological work when she<br />

was admitted to the PICU at the former County Hospital in Durham. When she<br />

moved on to Newcastle and then to Kneesworth House, psychologists carried<br />

out assessments, but they did not tackle the more difficult task of engaging her<br />

in therapeutic treatment.<br />

• A year after her discharge, Social Worker 4 tried to arrange some formal<br />

counselling for her. At this point Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was ambivalent about<br />

engaging in this work. It took at least six months for an agency to indicate that<br />

they would be willing to work with her. By this time, she appeared to have lost<br />

any interest that she had had in doing this work and she did not approach the<br />

agency herself as they had requested. Social Worker 4 then attempted to have<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> referred for psychotherapy – but again it took over six months<br />

for her to be seen. It appears that little effort was then made to encourage her<br />

to take up the option of doing this work, on the grounds that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong><br />

was apparently only looking for symptom relief. Subsequently, she was never<br />

referred for any form of therapy, despite various staff discussing the potential<br />

value of this for her.<br />

• The panel was told that, at that time, there were no specific services for people<br />

with personality disorders and specialist treatments such as dialectical behaviour<br />

therapy were unavailable. Whilst it might have been difficult to engage Louisa<br />

<strong>Ovington</strong> in psychodynamic therapy and the process of it might have been very<br />

disturbing for her, it was unfortunate that it took so long for her to be referred<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!