05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 1 - NARRATIVE OF KEY DATES AND EVENTS<br />

• Social Worker 2 was Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s community social worker and was liaising<br />

with Social Worker 3, the Kneesworth social worker. Social Worker 2 is recorded<br />

as speaking to Kneesworth on 6 January to try to organise a CPA/Section 117 41<br />

meeting. Because of the imminence of the expiry of the Section 38 it was<br />

not possible to organise this before the 12 January and it was finally scheduled<br />

for 24 January, ten days after her discharge.<br />

• Team Manager 1 from Easington Community Mental Health Team (CMHT)<br />

recorded his concern that good practice had not been adhered to: Section 117<br />

Mental Health Act requires a discharge meeting between the host authority<br />

and the local services to “hand over care” and the Code of Practice states that<br />

a joint meeting needs to be held (before discharge) so as to arrive at a suitable<br />

discharge package. Before the decision is taken to discharge a patient or<br />

grant leave it is the responsibility of the Responsible Medical Officer (RMO) to<br />

ensure a consultation with all other professionals, to discuss the patient’s needs<br />

and that the care plan addresses them. 42<br />

• To complicate matters Probation Officer 1 commented to Team Manager 1<br />

that he did not think a probation order was appropriate simply to ensure<br />

treatment and although the later discharge <strong>report</strong> prepared on 31 January<br />

2000 (19 days after discharge) by Associate Specialist 1 emphasised the necessity<br />

of a probation order having a condition of psychiatric treatment, it appeared that<br />

since there was no apparent diagnosis of mental illness, the probation service did<br />

not regard it as appropriate.<br />

97. Consultant 11 when she spoke to the panel agreed that the discharge had been<br />

hasty and there did not appear to have been much in the way of planning.<br />

98. On 24 January 2000 the delayed Section 117/CPA meeting took place in Durham.<br />

It was attended by representatives from Kneesworth House and local services.<br />

There was no consultant psychiatrist present although Associate Specialist 1 was in<br />

attendance. At this meeting it was stated that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> did not suffer from a<br />

mental illness and although she may have some personality difficulties did not meet<br />

the criteria for a personality disorder. It was agreed that:<br />

• Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> would live with her cousin and the cousin’s partner Mr Hilton;<br />

• Consultant 12 would become Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s consultant psychiatrist;<br />

• Her social worker and key worker would be Social Worker 2;<br />

41 See Chapter 8<br />

42 and see, further, Chapter 8<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!