Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 2 – EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT OF<br />
LOUISA OVINGTON<br />
78<br />
Addictions services<br />
The panel was informed that addiction services were mainly provided by three teams:<br />
ESMI (Easington Substance Misuse Initiative) which covered the Peterlee area; CAS<br />
(Community Addictions Service) which covered the Sedgefield District Council locality<br />
and NECA (the <strong>North</strong> <strong>East</strong> Council for Addictions). The first two services worked with<br />
clients on a practical and medical level to address their addictions, the third was a<br />
counselling service. Whilst there were addiction services in the area, the panel was told<br />
that they focussed mostly on opiate use and that alcohol services were more “thin on<br />
the ground”. Thus, alcohol treatment was largely left to the care of general mental<br />
health services.<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was apparently first seen by drug and alcohol services regarding her<br />
drug use when she was 15 or 16, although the panel has seen no contemporaneous<br />
records of this contact. She was referred to ESMI just prior to her first admission – but<br />
the panel again saw no records of this contact, if it did occur.<br />
The issue of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s substance misuse was not specifically addressed whilst<br />
she was at the Tony White Unit or at St Nicholas’ Hospital, although its contribution to<br />
her difficulties was noted.<br />
When she was at St Nicholas’ hospital she was assessed by a psychologist from the<br />
Newcastle forensic adolescent service who noted that drug use was an issue, but that<br />
although she might respond to relapse-prevention work she had at that time little<br />
motivation to change. It was suggested that a motivational interviewing approach<br />
regarding drugs might be useful. Psychologist 1 (psychologist at St Nicholas’) noted<br />
that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> related all her past difficulties to the abuse of illegal drugs.<br />
Consultant 10 (Psychiatrist from Rampton who assessed her at St Nicholas’) described<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> as a complex and quite profoundly disturbed individual. He felt that<br />
she required a period of treatment in a controlled setting until that was a satisfactory<br />
understanding of her emotional insecurity and instability and until there was<br />
adequate support to ensure that she did not take drugs. Otherwise, he felt that the<br />
consequences could be serious or indeed grave.<br />
When Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> moved on to Kneesworth House, she engaged in a psychology<br />
assessment process, but during this it was noted that although she clearly attributed<br />
all her difficulties to her substance misuse, she was “blithely convinced” she would<br />
have no difficulty avoiding drugs in the future. One to one psychology sessions and<br />
a drug and alcohol group were proposed to address Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s lack of relapse<br />
prevention strategies regarding illicit substance use. An inexperienced psychologist<br />
attempted to work with Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> on this, but Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was apparently<br />
resistant and guarded and she avoided effectively doing this work. She did, however,