05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2 – EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT OF<br />

LOUISA OVINGTON<br />

78<br />

Addictions services<br />

The panel was informed that addiction services were mainly provided by three teams:<br />

ESMI (Easington Substance Misuse Initiative) which covered the Peterlee area; CAS<br />

(Community Addictions Service) which covered the Sedgefield District Council locality<br />

and NECA (the <strong>North</strong> <strong>East</strong> Council for Addictions). The first two services worked with<br />

clients on a practical and medical level to address their addictions, the third was a<br />

counselling service. Whilst there were addiction services in the area, the panel was told<br />

that they focussed mostly on opiate use and that alcohol services were more “thin on<br />

the ground”. Thus, alcohol treatment was largely left to the care of general mental<br />

health services.<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was apparently first seen by drug and alcohol services regarding her<br />

drug use when she was 15 or 16, although the panel has seen no contemporaneous<br />

records of this contact. She was referred to ESMI just prior to her first admission – but<br />

the panel again saw no records of this contact, if it did occur.<br />

The issue of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s substance misuse was not specifically addressed whilst<br />

she was at the Tony White Unit or at St Nicholas’ Hospital, although its contribution to<br />

her difficulties was noted.<br />

When she was at St Nicholas’ hospital she was assessed by a psychologist from the<br />

Newcastle forensic adolescent service who noted that drug use was an issue, but that<br />

although she might respond to relapse-prevention work she had at that time little<br />

motivation to change. It was suggested that a motivational interviewing approach<br />

regarding drugs might be useful. Psychologist 1 (psychologist at St Nicholas’) noted<br />

that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> related all her past difficulties to the abuse of illegal drugs.<br />

Consultant 10 (Psychiatrist from Rampton who assessed her at St Nicholas’) described<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> as a complex and quite profoundly disturbed individual. He felt that<br />

she required a period of treatment in a controlled setting until that was a satisfactory<br />

understanding of her emotional insecurity and instability and until there was<br />

adequate support to ensure that she did not take drugs. Otherwise, he felt that the<br />

consequences could be serious or indeed grave.<br />

When Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> moved on to Kneesworth House, she engaged in a psychology<br />

assessment process, but during this it was noted that although she clearly attributed<br />

all her difficulties to her substance misuse, she was “blithely convinced” she would<br />

have no difficulty avoiding drugs in the future. One to one psychology sessions and<br />

a drug and alcohol group were proposed to address Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s lack of relapse<br />

prevention strategies regarding illicit substance use. An inexperienced psychologist<br />

attempted to work with Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> on this, but Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was apparently<br />

resistant and guarded and she avoided effectively doing this work. She did, however,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!