05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 1 - NARRATIVE OF KEY DATES AND EVENTS<br />

66<br />

217. Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was accepted on a Home Office programme attempting to<br />

treat dangerous and severe personality disordered offenders while in custody.<br />

COMMENT<br />

During the last few months before the death of Mr Hilton, Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was<br />

allocated to a new probation officer and a new care coordinator. She strongly disliked<br />

the probation officer and was aggressive to her. Her response to CPN 2 however<br />

seemed positive, although subsequently (after the death) she admitted that she had<br />

lied to CPN 2 about her drinking.<br />

CPN 2 told the panel that she had “a few apprehensions” when she first started<br />

working with Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> “because of her history”, but Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was<br />

never hostile or threatening to her. She knew that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was chaotic,<br />

abused drugs and alcohol to quite a severe extent, had been on a secure unit and had<br />

had drug induced psychosis. However, CPN 2 told the panel that she did not think she<br />

was given enough information about Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>. Despite this however the care<br />

plan prepared by CPN 2 was detailed and Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was appropriately placed<br />

on enhanced CPA, (although the risk assessment may have suffered from her lack of<br />

information).<br />

The panel is surprised that following the decision by probation that no home visit<br />

should be made to Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> because of her aggressive and abusive behaviour,<br />

this information was not, apparently, passed on to the care coordinator or any<br />

other agency. CPN 2 (and Support Worker 1) continued to make lone visits to Louisa<br />

<strong>Ovington</strong> at home.<br />

In the last few months of 2005, although Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s behaviour continued to be<br />

disturbed, there was nothing that might have indicated to the care coordinator that<br />

Mr Hilton’s death at the hands of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was imminent, or more likely.<br />

The panel noted with great concern that throughout their dealings with Louisa<br />

<strong>Ovington</strong>, none of the agencies (other than the police) was recorded as having made<br />

contact with Mr Hilton, the person with whom she had the most significant and<br />

longstanding adult relationship outside of her family. In view of the turbulence of their<br />

relationship, the frequent allegations of domestic violence, each against the other and<br />

frequent threats made by Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> that she would kill or attack Mr Hilton, the<br />

panel is surprised that there are no records of Mr Hilton being involved in any care<br />

planning, or being spoken to about the risks she posed to him.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!