Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 1 - NARRATIVE OF KEY DATES AND EVENTS<br />
66<br />
217. Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was accepted on a Home Office programme attempting to<br />
treat dangerous and severe personality disordered offenders while in custody.<br />
COMMENT<br />
During the last few months before the death of Mr Hilton, Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was<br />
allocated to a new probation officer and a new care coordinator. She strongly disliked<br />
the probation officer and was aggressive to her. Her response to CPN 2 however<br />
seemed positive, although subsequently (after the death) she admitted that she had<br />
lied to CPN 2 about her drinking.<br />
CPN 2 told the panel that she had “a few apprehensions” when she first started<br />
working with Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> “because of her history”, but Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was<br />
never hostile or threatening to her. She knew that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was chaotic,<br />
abused drugs and alcohol to quite a severe extent, had been on a secure unit and had<br />
had drug induced psychosis. However, CPN 2 told the panel that she did not think she<br />
was given enough information about Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>. Despite this however the care<br />
plan prepared by CPN 2 was detailed and Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was appropriately placed<br />
on enhanced CPA, (although the risk assessment may have suffered from her lack of<br />
information).<br />
The panel is surprised that following the decision by probation that no home visit<br />
should be made to Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> because of her aggressive and abusive behaviour,<br />
this information was not, apparently, passed on to the care coordinator or any<br />
other agency. CPN 2 (and Support Worker 1) continued to make lone visits to Louisa<br />
<strong>Ovington</strong> at home.<br />
In the last few months of 2005, although Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s behaviour continued to be<br />
disturbed, there was nothing that might have indicated to the care coordinator that<br />
Mr Hilton’s death at the hands of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was imminent, or more likely.<br />
The panel noted with great concern that throughout their dealings with Louisa<br />
<strong>Ovington</strong>, none of the agencies (other than the police) was recorded as having made<br />
contact with Mr Hilton, the person with whom she had the most significant and<br />
longstanding adult relationship outside of her family. In view of the turbulence of their<br />
relationship, the frequent allegations of domestic violence, each against the other and<br />
frequent threats made by Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> that she would kill or attack Mr Hilton, the<br />
panel is surprised that there are no records of Mr Hilton being involved in any care<br />
planning, or being spoken to about the risks she posed to him.