05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

129. Although Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> continued to suffer from the same sorts of underlying<br />

problems (mental health, substance – mainly alcohol - abuse, pressure from her<br />

father), her overall situation remained reasonably stable throughout 2002 and she<br />

appeared to be attending some sort of college course. Social Worker 4 felt it was the<br />

right time to hand her over to her local CMHT in Easington (<strong>East</strong> Durham). Additionally<br />

he told the panel that because of a border reorganisation Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s home<br />

address was no longer in his catchment area. Until that point Social Worker 4 told the<br />

panel, his team (Spennymoor, South Durham) had been purely a mental health social<br />

work team. Now the new CMHTs were multi disciplinary. Care was handed to Social<br />

Worker 5, who was a mental health social worker. Social Worker 4 tried to set up a<br />

CPA meeting so that the handover could be done in a planned and informed way, but<br />

the meeting was cancelled. Social Worker 4 visited Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> on 28 January<br />

2003 and explained what was happening.<br />

COMMENT<br />

Psychiatric organisation:<br />

It was evident to the panel from the records and confirmed by several witnesses that<br />

in this locality there were significant medical staffing issues in from 2000 to 2002.<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was notionally involved with eight different psychiatrists between<br />

January 2000 and December 2002. There was a series of locums, each staying in post<br />

only a matter of weeks or months. Consequently Social Worker 4 did not know who<br />

had consultant responsibility for Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>. This, added to her own generally<br />

chaotic behaviour, made it understandable that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> did not engage with<br />

the psychiatric services. Medical continuity was further impaired by the fact that Louisa<br />

<strong>Ovington</strong> changed GP during this period.<br />

CRO:<br />

CHAPTER 1 - NARRATIVE OF KEY DATES AND EVENTS<br />

The Community Rehabilitation Order carried with it a condition of psychiatric<br />

supervision. There was never any clarity about who would take responsibility for this,<br />

despite the fact that Consultant 5 had stated in his <strong>report</strong> for the court that he would<br />

be content to be the supervisor. He only saw Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> once. Social Worker 4<br />

repeatedly tried to find out who she was supposed to be seeing.<br />

Consultant 5 told the panel that whenever he made a recommendation for a<br />

condition of psychiatric treatment he would offer to be the supervisor but that it was<br />

“very seldom” that he was given written confirmation of this or any other details of<br />

the order. He was not given any certification of this sort following Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s<br />

appearance in Court on this occasion and thus she fell through the net.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!