Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
129. Although Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> continued to suffer from the same sorts of underlying<br />
problems (mental health, substance – mainly alcohol - abuse, pressure from her<br />
father), her overall situation remained reasonably stable throughout 2002 and she<br />
appeared to be attending some sort of college course. Social Worker 4 felt it was the<br />
right time to hand her over to her local CMHT in Easington (<strong>East</strong> Durham). Additionally<br />
he told the panel that because of a border reorganisation Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s home<br />
address was no longer in his catchment area. Until that point Social Worker 4 told the<br />
panel, his team (Spennymoor, South Durham) had been purely a mental health social<br />
work team. Now the new CMHTs were multi disciplinary. Care was handed to Social<br />
Worker 5, who was a mental health social worker. Social Worker 4 tried to set up a<br />
CPA meeting so that the handover could be done in a planned and informed way, but<br />
the meeting was cancelled. Social Worker 4 visited Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> on 28 January<br />
2003 and explained what was happening.<br />
COMMENT<br />
Psychiatric organisation:<br />
It was evident to the panel from the records and confirmed by several witnesses that<br />
in this locality there were significant medical staffing issues in from 2000 to 2002.<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was notionally involved with eight different psychiatrists between<br />
January 2000 and December 2002. There was a series of locums, each staying in post<br />
only a matter of weeks or months. Consequently Social Worker 4 did not know who<br />
had consultant responsibility for Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>. This, added to her own generally<br />
chaotic behaviour, made it understandable that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> did not engage with<br />
the psychiatric services. Medical continuity was further impaired by the fact that Louisa<br />
<strong>Ovington</strong> changed GP during this period.<br />
CRO:<br />
CHAPTER 1 - NARRATIVE OF KEY DATES AND EVENTS<br />
The Community Rehabilitation Order carried with it a condition of psychiatric<br />
supervision. There was never any clarity about who would take responsibility for this,<br />
despite the fact that Consultant 5 had stated in his <strong>report</strong> for the court that he would<br />
be content to be the supervisor. He only saw Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> once. Social Worker 4<br />
repeatedly tried to find out who she was supposed to be seeing.<br />
Consultant 5 told the panel that whenever he made a recommendation for a<br />
condition of psychiatric treatment he would offer to be the supervisor but that it was<br />
“very seldom” that he was given written confirmation of this or any other details of<br />
the order. He was not given any certification of this sort following Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s<br />
appearance in Court on this occasion and thus she fell through the net.<br />
43