05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 1 - NARRATIVE OF KEY DATES AND EVENTS<br />

118. Between early 2001 and May 2001, because of mounting concerns felt by Social<br />

Worker 4, there were a number of attempts by Social Worker 4 and her GP to refer<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> to a psychiatrist, to psychology and to CPN services. The records show<br />

a great deal of confusion, with Social Worker 4 making considerable effort to little<br />

effect. There does not appear to have been psychiatric follow up after her admission<br />

to Darlington Memorial Hospital, there was no apparent referral to CPN services<br />

despite Social Worker 4 obtaining confirmation from the hospital that they would<br />

do this and the referral to psychology had to be done by the GP and psychiatrist and<br />

could not apparently be done by the mental health social worker, Social Worker 4,<br />

who knew her best and had most contact with her. At this point Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>,<br />

despite her admission to Darlington Memorial Hospital, had not apparently seen a<br />

psychiatrist in the community since her discharge from Kneesworth in January 2000.<br />

119. On 12 February a pre-sentence <strong>report</strong> by Probation Officer 3, in relation to the<br />

offensive weapon charge had concluded that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> posed a high risk of<br />

reoffending, risk of dangerousness and harm to the public; that she had used a knife<br />

in the past and was irrational and unsafe. The probation officer noted that “past<br />

psychiatric assessment does not regard Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s behaviour as warranting<br />

the attachment to it of any mental health diagnosis”. However she suggested that a<br />

psychiatric <strong>report</strong> was needed. She concluded that a period in custody would add to<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s instability, particularly as she had told the probation officer that she<br />

would attempt to harm herself if detained in prison.<br />

120. On 16 May 2001 Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> saw Consultant 5 for the preparation of a<br />

court <strong>report</strong>. The <strong>report</strong> dated 5 June 2001 concluded that there was substantial<br />

evidence of personality disorder and an ongoing liability to suffer with mental illness.<br />

He noted that she was still abusing drugs and alcohol and recommended a probation<br />

order with a condition of psychiatric treatment which he said he was prepared to<br />

supervise.<br />

121. Although it is quite unclear how it came about, a domiciliary visit was made<br />

by Consultant 13 (a locum consultant) to Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> on 25 May 2001. He<br />

recommended she continue with Trazadone (as already prescribed by the GP) and<br />

attend outpatients with Consultant 14.<br />

122. On 7 June 2001 Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was convicted 49 of possession of an offensive<br />

weapon and of breaching her previous conditional discharge of 9 February 2000.<br />

She was given an 18 month Community Rehabilitation Order (CRO) with a condition<br />

of psychiatric treatment. It was not made clear how the condition of psychiatric<br />

treatment was supposed to operate.<br />

123. On 22 June Social Worker 4 was informed that Consultant 5 would be the<br />

responsible doctor for the CRO.<br />

49 5th conviction<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!