05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Recommendation 16. Trusts should review clinical practice to ensure, in<br />

relation to psychometric tests, that they are only regarded as an adjunct<br />

to clinical judgement to inform diagnosis. They should not, on their<br />

own, be regarded as diagnostic instruments.<br />

c) Personality disorder services<br />

When Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was transferred to St Nicholas’ Hospital she was thought<br />

to be suffering from a personality disorder (possibly psychopathic) and mental<br />

illness (possibly schizophrenia or bipolar disorder). By the time she was<br />

transferred on to Kneesworth House, there was less evidence that she was<br />

suffering from a mental illness but staff were clearer that she was suffering<br />

from a personality disorder. However, when she was finally discharged back into<br />

the community there was still no clarity as to her diagnosis. The discharge <strong>report</strong><br />

from Kneesworth House stated that she had a “past history” of mental illness<br />

and that she “could not be said to have a personality disorder”. Inconsistently,<br />

the staff from Kneesworth House stated at Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s post-discharge<br />

care planning meeting that they felt she needed a condition of treatment<br />

attached to a probation order, but they did not specify whether she needed<br />

treatment for illness, personality disorder, or both. This lack of clarity about<br />

diagnosis meant that no appropriate treatment plan was formulated. It appears<br />

evident to the panel that thereafter Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s mental health difficulties<br />

were not taken so seriously and there was at times reluctance from services to be<br />

involved with her because she was not regarded as mentally ill.<br />

• Recommendation 17. The trusts need to be clear where the remit<br />

for working with people with personality disorders falls. It needs to<br />

be recognised that personality disorders can be as serious as illnesses<br />

such as schizophrenia in terms of their negative impact on the individual<br />

and the society around them. Appropriate, ideally specialist, services<br />

need to be provided for such patients and the professionals working<br />

with them need specific training and support.<br />

d) Use of forensic services<br />

CHAPTER 9 – CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was followed up in the community by general adult mental<br />

health services; the CMHT, the addictions services and, at times, the CRT. Given<br />

her history of violence and her detention in conditions of medium security,<br />

following her discharge from Kneesworth House she should at least have been<br />

discussed with, if not taken on by, the forensic services, which the panel were<br />

told would have been willing and able to work with her.<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!