05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 9 – CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

146<br />

and subsequently for the assessment for psychological work to take place, as any<br />

motivation she had for doing the work appears to have been lost during the<br />

intervening period.<br />

• Recommendation 21. Trusts should review the provision and availability<br />

of “talking therapies”, including dialectic behavioural therapy in the trust<br />

area and encourage clinicians to actively consider whether the needs of a<br />

patient should be addressed by psychotherapy or psychology. This is<br />

particularly important where a patient (such as Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>) has<br />

suffered some form of extreme childhood trauma.<br />

g) Referral procedures<br />

The panel noted that on a number of occasions there was confusion about how<br />

referrals to services should, or could be made.<br />

Examples were:<br />

i. In April 2001, Social Worker 4 was attempting to get psychological support for<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>. It appeared to the panel remarkably difficult for him to get<br />

someone to refer her, as he kept being advised to discuss the matter with<br />

different people. It was unclear why he could not refer her to the psychology<br />

department himself. The referral to Psychotherapist 1 was finally done by<br />

Consultant 5 in July 2001. 98<br />

ii. At around the same time, Social Worker 4 was trying to get Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong><br />

referred to CPN services, which should have been done after her discharge from<br />

Darlington Memorial Hospital in February 2001. He seemed to be unable to<br />

effect this referral and again, the panel was unclear about why. 99<br />

iii. In early 2002 there was no clarity at all about who was responsible for<br />

overseeing Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s psychiatric care. Social Worker 4 was attempting to<br />

find out about her current mental health. After several calls, first to Consultant<br />

14 (who he was informed had left several months earlier) and then to Consultant<br />

13, to no effect, he was told by Consultant 13’s secretary that if he wished to<br />

access Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s outpatient records, he should ask the GP to get hold of<br />

them.<br />

iv. On 10 June 2004 the emergency duty social worker received a referral from<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s landlady about Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s extremely disturbed<br />

behaviour. The social worker rang the GP, who told her to contact the CRT, who<br />

refused to take a referral from the social worker, as it ‘needed to come from a<br />

98 Chapter 1 paragraph 126<br />

99 Chapter 1 paragraph 118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!