05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 8 – USE OF THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE<br />

CODE OF PRACTICE<br />

128<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> spent living in the community after the lifting of this detention the<br />

authorities remained under a specific duty to provide her with care, in addition to<br />

their general duties under community care legislation and under the CPA.<br />

It appears from the records that a CPA meeting was held on 21 February 1996 to plan<br />

for Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s discharge, although the panel has not seen the record of the<br />

meeting itself.<br />

Despite several short admissions to hospital, the Mental Health Act was not used<br />

again until June 1998.<br />

On 30 May 1998 Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was remanded to Low Newton Prison, Durham, on<br />

charges of theft, threats to kill, possession of a bladed article and criminal damage.<br />

Serious concerns were expressed about her mental state and on 5 June 1998 she was<br />

transferred to the Tony White Unit at the County Hospital Durham under the care of<br />

Consultant 5, under Section 35 of the Act, to enable a <strong>report</strong> to be prepared on her<br />

mental condition and a recommendation as to sentence. Section 35 enables a court<br />

to remand a person to hospital, for up to 28 days, for a <strong>report</strong> to be prepared. The<br />

period can be renewed, for 28 days each time, to a maximum of 12 weeks.<br />

COMMENT<br />

This seems to have been an appropriate use of Section 35 and properly implemented.<br />

There must have been one renewal as the matter did not come back to court for<br />

sentence until 17 July 1998.<br />

Consultant 5 expressed his view that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was suffering from a mental<br />

illness and personality disorder and recommended that the court should make an<br />

order under Section 37 of the Act ( often known as a ‘hospital order’) so that she<br />

could receive treatment in hospital. Section 37 provides that a court can, on conviction<br />

for an imprisonable offence, authorise an admission to and detention in hospital<br />

provided certain criteria (as to the existence of mental disorder and appropriateness<br />

of the admission) are met. On 17 July 1998 an order was made under Section 37 and<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> returned to the Tony White Unit for treatment.<br />

She remained under Section 37 until she was transferred to St Nicholas’ Hospital in<br />

January 1999.<br />

COMMENT<br />

Again, this seemed to be an appropriate use of Section 37, properly implemented.<br />

Section 37 is often accompanied by a ‘restriction order’ under Section 41- an order<br />

made by the court restricting the patient’s discharge, transfer, or leave from hospital<br />

without the consent of the Home Office. The order can only be made where it is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!