Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 8 – USE OF THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE<br />
CODE OF PRACTICE<br />
128<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> spent living in the community after the lifting of this detention the<br />
authorities remained under a specific duty to provide her with care, in addition to<br />
their general duties under community care legislation and under the CPA.<br />
It appears from the records that a CPA meeting was held on 21 February 1996 to plan<br />
for Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s discharge, although the panel has not seen the record of the<br />
meeting itself.<br />
Despite several short admissions to hospital, the Mental Health Act was not used<br />
again until June 1998.<br />
On 30 May 1998 Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was remanded to Low Newton Prison, Durham, on<br />
charges of theft, threats to kill, possession of a bladed article and criminal damage.<br />
Serious concerns were expressed about her mental state and on 5 June 1998 she was<br />
transferred to the Tony White Unit at the County Hospital Durham under the care of<br />
Consultant 5, under Section 35 of the Act, to enable a <strong>report</strong> to be prepared on her<br />
mental condition and a recommendation as to sentence. Section 35 enables a court<br />
to remand a person to hospital, for up to 28 days, for a <strong>report</strong> to be prepared. The<br />
period can be renewed, for 28 days each time, to a maximum of 12 weeks.<br />
COMMENT<br />
This seems to have been an appropriate use of Section 35 and properly implemented.<br />
There must have been one renewal as the matter did not come back to court for<br />
sentence until 17 July 1998.<br />
Consultant 5 expressed his view that Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was suffering from a mental<br />
illness and personality disorder and recommended that the court should make an<br />
order under Section 37 of the Act ( often known as a ‘hospital order’) so that she<br />
could receive treatment in hospital. Section 37 provides that a court can, on conviction<br />
for an imprisonable offence, authorise an admission to and detention in hospital<br />
provided certain criteria (as to the existence of mental disorder and appropriateness<br />
of the admission) are met. On 17 July 1998 an order was made under Section 37 and<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> returned to the Tony White Unit for treatment.<br />
She remained under Section 37 until she was transferred to St Nicholas’ Hospital in<br />
January 1999.<br />
COMMENT<br />
Again, this seemed to be an appropriate use of Section 37, properly implemented.<br />
Section 37 is often accompanied by a ‘restriction order’ under Section 41- an order<br />
made by the court restricting the patient’s discharge, transfer, or leave from hospital<br />
without the consent of the Home Office. The order can only be made where it is