Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
During Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s first admission it was understandable that apparently no<br />
attempt was made to address Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s underlying psychological difficulties,<br />
as her paranoid and aggressive presentation would have prevented this. The child and<br />
adolescent psychiatrist who assessed her in January 1996 expressed concerns for her<br />
future, referring to her possible personality difficulties.<br />
Although there was a plan to refer Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> to psychology during her second<br />
admission, there was no further reference to this in the records.<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s third admission to Hartlepool General Hospital (in March 1997)<br />
was very brief and was precipitated by her use of drugs. Two months later she was<br />
admitted to the Royal Edinburgh Hospital for ten days. During this admission it was<br />
noted that the deterioration in her mental state might have been due in part to her<br />
having recently had contact with her father who had just been released from prison.<br />
Various other possible psychological triggers were also noted. However, there is<br />
no reference to her being referred for any specific treatment for her psychological<br />
problems – but again this is understandable given that she told the staff that she was<br />
not certain that she would be staying in the area.<br />
Over the course of the next year (30 May 1997 to 5 June 1998) Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was<br />
followed up in the community by Consultant 6 and CPN 1. The focus of their work<br />
appears to have been monitoring of her mental state in relation to her psychotic<br />
symptoms and their treatment. There was no evidence of psychological work.<br />
Tony White Unit<br />
CHAPTER 2 – EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT OF<br />
LOUISA OVINGTON<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was admitted to the Tony White Unit on 5 June1998. Although her<br />
psychological issues were noted by the clinical team, it was not feasible to address<br />
Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s psychological difficulties whilst she was there; her behaviour was<br />
too disturbed and the unit was not set up for this sort of work, including anger<br />
management training, which Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> specifically requested. Consultant<br />
5 commented that she suffered, “to an extent”, from a psychopathic personality<br />
disorder. (He was concerned about how this could be treated, as he feared that she<br />
would not engage. However, without treatment he foresaw her as having a “tragic<br />
future”).<br />
The clinical team tried to manage Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s verbal and physical outbursts<br />
using behavioural techniques, but there was also evidence that the nursing staff were<br />
aware of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s early life history and that they gave her time to ventilate<br />
her views about it. They did not, however, discuss this in depth, because, as Sister 1<br />
told the panel, the whole point of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> being at Tony White Unit was to<br />
“settle her” and such discussions would have upset her. She did however talk with<br />
the nursing staff about her ambivalent feelings about her father (who came to see her<br />
whilst she was there).<br />
71