05.08.2013 Views

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

Lousia Ovington independent investigation report ... - NHS North East

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

During Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s first admission it was understandable that apparently no<br />

attempt was made to address Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s underlying psychological difficulties,<br />

as her paranoid and aggressive presentation would have prevented this. The child and<br />

adolescent psychiatrist who assessed her in January 1996 expressed concerns for her<br />

future, referring to her possible personality difficulties.<br />

Although there was a plan to refer Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> to psychology during her second<br />

admission, there was no further reference to this in the records.<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s third admission to Hartlepool General Hospital (in March 1997)<br />

was very brief and was precipitated by her use of drugs. Two months later she was<br />

admitted to the Royal Edinburgh Hospital for ten days. During this admission it was<br />

noted that the deterioration in her mental state might have been due in part to her<br />

having recently had contact with her father who had just been released from prison.<br />

Various other possible psychological triggers were also noted. However, there is<br />

no reference to her being referred for any specific treatment for her psychological<br />

problems – but again this is understandable given that she told the staff that she was<br />

not certain that she would be staying in the area.<br />

Over the course of the next year (30 May 1997 to 5 June 1998) Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was<br />

followed up in the community by Consultant 6 and CPN 1. The focus of their work<br />

appears to have been monitoring of her mental state in relation to her psychotic<br />

symptoms and their treatment. There was no evidence of psychological work.<br />

Tony White Unit<br />

CHAPTER 2 – EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT OF<br />

LOUISA OVINGTON<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> was admitted to the Tony White Unit on 5 June1998. Although her<br />

psychological issues were noted by the clinical team, it was not feasible to address<br />

Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s psychological difficulties whilst she was there; her behaviour was<br />

too disturbed and the unit was not set up for this sort of work, including anger<br />

management training, which Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> specifically requested. Consultant<br />

5 commented that she suffered, “to an extent”, from a psychopathic personality<br />

disorder. (He was concerned about how this could be treated, as he feared that she<br />

would not engage. However, without treatment he foresaw her as having a “tragic<br />

future”).<br />

The clinical team tried to manage Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s verbal and physical outbursts<br />

using behavioural techniques, but there was also evidence that the nursing staff were<br />

aware of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong>’s early life history and that they gave her time to ventilate<br />

her views about it. They did not, however, discuss this in depth, because, as Sister 1<br />

told the panel, the whole point of Louisa <strong>Ovington</strong> being at Tony White Unit was to<br />

“settle her” and such discussions would have upset her. She did however talk with<br />

the nursing staff about her ambivalent feelings about her father (who came to see her<br />

whilst she was there).<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!