Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE
Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE
Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 154 Homeopathy 17<br />
2.3.2.3 Low back pain<br />
A review of Quinn et al 23 found limited evi<strong>de</strong>nce (one high quality RCT) that<br />
homeopathic gel (Spiroflor SRL) and Cremor Capsici Compositus (CCC) are equally<br />
effective in the treatm<strong>en</strong>t of low back pain and that SRL has a lower risk of adverse<br />
effects than CCC. However, as stated in the original study there is no proof that CCC<br />
is effective in itself.<br />
2.3.2.4 Third trimester cervical rip<strong>en</strong>ing or induction of labour<br />
Smith et al 51 , based on 2 small trials involving 133 wom<strong>en</strong>, found no differ<strong>en</strong>ces.<br />
In any of the primary outcome measures <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>cribed in this review. The quality of the<br />
trials was difficult to assess because of insuffici<strong>en</strong>t <strong>de</strong>tail in the research papers, and the<br />
small sample sizes provi<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong> ina<strong>de</strong>quate power.<br />
2.3.2.5 Chronic fatigue<br />
Bagnal et al 52 found that one RCT of good quality showed some evi<strong>de</strong>nce on one of 5<br />
measures of fatigue and one in 5 measures of functional limitations. However, this<br />
should be viewed with caution because statistical significance was bor<strong>de</strong>rline with a<br />
consi<strong>de</strong>rable multiple testing problem as statistical significance was tested twice on 5<br />
inter<strong>de</strong>p<strong>en</strong><strong>de</strong>nt measures increasing the possibility of spuriously significant results .<br />
2.3.2.6 Dem<strong>en</strong>tia<br />
McCarney et al 31 found no evi<strong>de</strong>nce (0 eligible studies) that homeopathic products have<br />
an effect on <strong>de</strong>m<strong>en</strong>tia and Robinson et al 39 found no evi<strong>de</strong>nce (0 eligible studies) of<br />
effect on wan<strong>de</strong>ring in <strong>de</strong>m<strong>en</strong>tia.<br />
2.3.2.7 Asthma<br />
McCarney et al 30 found 5 trials of variable quality that did not <strong>de</strong>monstrate an effect and<br />
conclu<strong>de</strong>d that there is insuffici<strong>en</strong>t evi<strong>de</strong>nce to reliably assess the possible role of<br />
homeopathy in asthma.<br />
2.3.2.8 Enuresis<br />
Glaz<strong>en</strong>er et al 32 found no evi<strong>de</strong>nce (0 studies) that homeopathy is effective for this<br />
condition.<br />
2.3.2.9 Depression<br />
2.3.2.10 Anxiety<br />
Pilkington et al 34 found no evi<strong>de</strong>nce (no RCT’s) for an effect in <strong>de</strong>pression.<br />
Pilkington et al 38 found 7 RCT’s but they report contradictory results, are<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rpowered or provi<strong>de</strong> insuffici<strong>en</strong>t <strong>de</strong>tails on methodology.<br />
2.3.2.11 Cancer related symptoms<br />
Kassab et al 46 retrieved 8 studies, found that 2 studies of high quality showed statistically<br />
significant results: cal<strong>en</strong>dula oinm<strong>en</strong>t for the prev<strong>en</strong>tion of acute <strong>de</strong>rmatitis during<br />
radiotherapy (Aria un<strong>de</strong>r the Curve Peto Odds ratio 0.42 [0.25, 0.68]) and Traumeel S<br />
mouthwash (a proprietary complex homeopathic medicine) in the treatm<strong>en</strong>t of<br />
chemotherapy-induced stomatitis (small study of 36 subjects stomatitis symptoms<br />
(WHO five point grading scale for mucositis Area un<strong>de</strong>r the curve): -14.24 [ -23.46, -<br />
5.02 ].These interv<strong>en</strong>tions require further evaluation. There is no convincing evi<strong>de</strong>nce<br />
for the efficacy of other homeopathic medicines for adverse symptoms and skin<br />
reactions related to radiotherapy, nor for wom<strong>en</strong> with breast cancer. An ol<strong>de</strong>r review<br />
Millazzo et al 36 found 6 studies of variable quality and reached similar conclusions.<br />
2.3.2.12 Hot flushes in wom<strong>en</strong> with a history of breast cancer<br />
Rada et al 48 i<strong>de</strong>ntified two RCT’s of high quality that found no effect.