Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE
Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE
Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 154 Homeopathy 61<br />
As for individual registration, the Colla law stipulates that it can be susp<strong>en</strong><strong>de</strong>d or<br />
withdrawn, as a punishm<strong>en</strong>t for failure of the practitioner to comply with the provisions<br />
of the law or its executory <strong>de</strong>cisions. Susp<strong>en</strong>sion (for a maximum period of one year)<br />
or withdrawal of individual registration is or<strong>de</strong>red by the minister at the proposal of the<br />
chamber concerned. Once again, the law <strong>de</strong>fines a procedure that has yet to be<br />
implem<strong>en</strong>ted by the King (the law itself does not stipulate an appeal procedure). 79<br />
The Colla law also stipulates sanctions in the case of exercise of one of the nonconv<strong>en</strong>tional<br />
practices, or habitually disp<strong>en</strong>sing treatm<strong>en</strong>ts linked to such registered<br />
non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practices, without being registered where registration has be<strong>en</strong><br />
susp<strong>en</strong><strong>de</strong>d or withdrawn. These off<strong>en</strong>ces are punishable by a fine and/or a prison<br />
s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce.<br />
Obligations of the practitioners of a registered non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practice<br />
The Colla law imposes an obligation of information on all practitioners of a registered<br />
non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practice.<br />
This obligation first stipulates keeping a record for each pati<strong>en</strong>t. No specific sanction has<br />
be<strong>en</strong> <strong>de</strong>fined for failure to comply with this obligation, which does not mean that it<br />
could not justify the susp<strong>en</strong>sion or withdrawal of individual registration. 78<br />
In accordance with the Colla law, a practitioner of a non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practice may only<br />
provi<strong>de</strong> a treatm<strong>en</strong>t for the pati<strong>en</strong>t after having received a rec<strong>en</strong>t diagnosis concerning<br />
the complaint, drawn up in writing by a doctor. This obligation only applies to<br />
practitioners who are not at the same time doctors. The pati<strong>en</strong>t is however allowed to<br />
refrain from a preceding doctor’s consultation. In this case, the pati<strong>en</strong>t must confirm<br />
this <strong>de</strong>cision in writing and this docum<strong>en</strong>t must th<strong>en</strong> be attached to the pati<strong>en</strong>t’s<br />
record. Failure to respect this obligation may not only be punishable by withdrawal or<br />
susp<strong>en</strong>sion of individual registration, but also a sanction (in the form of a fine).<br />
Moreover, it emerges from preparatory parliam<strong>en</strong>tary works that failure to respect this<br />
obligation by a non-doctor practitioner does not exonerate practitioners from their<br />
own responsibility. Non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practitioners remain responsible for the indication<br />
of the treatm<strong>en</strong>t that they int<strong>en</strong>d to un<strong>de</strong>rtake, without subsequ<strong>en</strong>tly being able to<br />
80 no.<br />
eva<strong>de</strong> responsibility un<strong>de</strong>r the sole pretext of an (erroneous) diagnosis of a doctor.<br />
1714/3<br />
Another obligation for practitioners of a registered non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practice is the<br />
duty of care. Un<strong>de</strong>r this obligation, the practitioner must take all necessary precautions<br />
to avoid the pati<strong>en</strong>t being <strong>de</strong>prived of conv<strong>en</strong>tional treatm<strong>en</strong>t. It emerges from<br />
preparatory parliam<strong>en</strong>tary docum<strong>en</strong>ts that this only concerns vital treatm<strong>en</strong>ts for the<br />
pati<strong>en</strong>t. The practitioner must, for example, draw the att<strong>en</strong>tion of the pati<strong>en</strong>t to the<br />
80 no. 1714/3<br />
need, where appropriate, to consult a doctor.<br />
In the context of this duty of care, the practitioner of a non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practice who<br />
is not a doctor is required to inform a doctor, at the doctor’s request, of the evolution<br />
of the health of the pati<strong>en</strong>t. However, this exchange of information cannot take place<br />
without the cons<strong>en</strong>t of the pati<strong>en</strong>t. The practitioner can also supply or obtain<br />
information from another practitioner of a non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practice. Finally, the Colla<br />
law also stipulates that doctors can also solicit at their own initiative information<br />
concerning the evolution of the health of their pati<strong>en</strong>ts from a non-doctor practitioner<br />
of a registered non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional practice, but only in the interest of the pati<strong>en</strong>t and<br />
with the pati<strong>en</strong>t’s cons<strong>en</strong>t. It should be noticed that the Colla law only refers to the<br />
evolution of the health of the pati<strong>en</strong>t, and not the treatm<strong>en</strong>t chos<strong>en</strong>. 78<br />
The Colla law also m<strong>en</strong>tions explicitly the applicability of article 458 of the criminal<br />
co<strong>de</strong> (professional secrecy) to the non-doctor practitioners of a non-conv<strong>en</strong>tional<br />
practice.<br />
The applicability of the Pati<strong>en</strong>ts Rights Act of 22 August 2002 to practitioners of a nonconv<strong>en</strong>tional<br />
practice is examined in point 5.1.5.2.