10.08.2013 Views

Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE

Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE

Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 Homeopathy <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 154<br />

4.3.10 Type of medicines used and type of homeopathy practiced.<br />

Medicines with korsakovian method of manufacture (multi-flask method here <strong>de</strong>noted<br />

as K) are more oft<strong>en</strong> prescribed (91,7%) than medicines with hahnemanian method of<br />

manufacture (single-flask method, here <strong>de</strong>noted as CH) (69,4%).<br />

Low or middle dilutions are more oft<strong>en</strong> prescribed than high or very high dilutions.<br />

Table 12: Dilutions used (expressed as CH) (n=144)<br />

%<br />

Low dilutions (12CH) 37,0%<br />

Therapists use a variety of homeopathic approaches: ‘classicist–unicist’ homeopaths are<br />

loyal to Hahnemann’s teachings and seek a single remedy tailored to each individual<br />

pati<strong>en</strong>t. They repres<strong>en</strong>t the great majority of homeopaths affiliated with a professional<br />

association (see next table). ‘Complex–pluralist’ homeopaths prescribe a combination of<br />

‘contextual’ and ‘fundam<strong>en</strong>tal’ remedies. Finally, clinical homeopaths favour the use of<br />

homeopathic remedies <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>igned to act on a specific organ or system. These remedies<br />

may or may not be <strong>de</strong>livered in complex form and usually in low dilution.<br />

Table 13: Type of homeopathy practices (n=144)<br />

All UHB LIGA<br />

Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy % Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy % Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy %<br />

No answer 3 2 1<br />

Classic/unicist 108 75,0% 80 69,6% 36 92,3%<br />

Complex 19 13,2% 19 16,5% 1 2,6%<br />

Clinical 29 20,1% 28 24,3% 1 2,6%<br />

Others 5 3,5% 4 3,5% 2 5,1%<br />

4.4 DISCUSSION<br />

This survey gives a <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>cription of the profile of homeopaths that are affiliated to a<br />

professional organisation, as stated in the objective. We have no information about non<br />

affiliated practitioners, which is a major limitation as affiliated members probably only<br />

repres<strong>en</strong>t 10 % of the practitioners, their profile may be differ<strong>en</strong>t as those professional<br />

organisations have a number of requirem<strong>en</strong>ts concerning training and practice and there<br />

may be consi<strong>de</strong>rable differ<strong>en</strong>ces in attitu<strong>de</strong>, <strong>de</strong>gree and way homeopathy is used<br />

amongst them. Another major limitation was the fact that the professional organisations<br />

c<strong>en</strong>sored our questionnaire and refused questions about use and attitu<strong>de</strong> towards<br />

vaccination, we know from our in <strong>de</strong>pth interviews that there is resistance towards<br />

vaccination among practitioners, but due to this refusal we do not have more<br />

information on this problem. Surveys in Germany, Austria, Australia and the USA<br />

docum<strong>en</strong>ted resistance against vaccination in similar surveys 73, 74 .This also implies that<br />

the survey should be rather se<strong>en</strong> as a <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>cription of what the professional organisations<br />

choose to reveal about their profile. Response rate was good compared with other<br />

similar surveys, but was lower for the UHP. According to stakehol<strong>de</strong>rs from the UHP<br />

this would still be a consequ<strong>en</strong>ce or resistance towards the remaining questions. We<br />

could find very few differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> practitioners from both professional<br />

organisations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!