10.08.2013 Views

Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE

Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE

Etat des lieux de l'homéopathie en Belgique - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 154 Homeopathy 19<br />

2.3.3.3 Vaccine uptake<br />

There is conflicting evi<strong>de</strong>nce regarding the relationship betwe<strong>en</strong> CAM (complem<strong>en</strong>tary<br />

& alternative medicine) use and vaccine uptake and the role of differ<strong>en</strong>t CAM provi<strong>de</strong>rs<br />

in this.<br />

Jones et al found that, overall, there were no statistically significant odds ratios betwe<strong>en</strong><br />

use of any of the CAM therapies (including homeopathy) and receiving either flu,<br />

pneumococcal, or both vaccines but could not exclu<strong>de</strong> it either 55, 56 . Zuzak et al found a<br />

significant relation betwe<strong>en</strong> CAM use and vaccine refusal but found that this was mainly<br />

due to pati<strong>en</strong>t prefer<strong>en</strong>ces and not induced by the CAM provi<strong>de</strong>r. He found that 43 %<br />

of users of homeopathy refused at least some basic vaccines but numbers specific for<br />

homeopathy were too small to find statistically significant results. Schonberger et al<br />

found that par<strong>en</strong>tal belief in homeopathy was a risk factor for non uptake of measles<br />

vaccination 57 . On the other hand, Stokley et al 58 found that CAM users had a higher<br />

vaccination coverage, ev<strong>en</strong> after adjusting for education and income level.<br />

2.3.4 Discussion and conclusions<br />

2.3.4.1 Main findings<br />

We did not find compelling evi<strong>de</strong>nce that homeopathy works for any single condition.<br />

Shang et al 59 pooled 110 studies on homeopathy and came to the similar conclusion that<br />

the findings are compatible with the notion that the clinical effects of homeopathy are<br />

placebo effects. We did not inclu<strong>de</strong> this study however because we consi<strong>de</strong>r it<br />

inappropriate to pool all treatm<strong>en</strong>ts for all conditions, giv<strong>en</strong> the very diverse nature of<br />

the conditions that are treated, with a diverse range of symptoms in which placebo<br />

effects may play a role to a varying <strong>de</strong>gree. The study was in contradiction with a study<br />

by Lin<strong>de</strong> et al 60 doing a similar pooling and who found a pooled effect incompatible with<br />

placebo but where no proof for any single condition could be found.<br />

We did not find evi<strong>de</strong>nce of si<strong>de</strong> effects and only anecdotal evi<strong>de</strong>nce for pati<strong>en</strong>t <strong>de</strong>lay<br />

caused by homeopaths. Also the relationship betwe<strong>en</strong> CAM use and vaccine uptake<br />

seems complex and we did not find compelling evi<strong>de</strong>nce for the accusation that<br />

homeopaths have a harmful influ<strong>en</strong>ce on the health seeking behavior of the pati<strong>en</strong>t. It is<br />

possible that homeopathy has a b<strong>en</strong>eficial effect on drug consumption of the pati<strong>en</strong>t.<br />

More research on these issues would be useful here.<br />

The quality of the reviews was variable but in g<strong>en</strong>eral acceptable. A lot of the studies<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the reviews were of low quality. The well conducted large trials did not<br />

show an effect.<br />

2.3.4.2 Placebo effect.<br />

The question of placebo effects is complex and one can ask if making the distinction<br />

placebo-‘real’ effects is always that useful in practice.<br />

The power of placebo effects and what is sometimes called ‘<strong>en</strong>hanced placebo effects’ is<br />

amongst others <strong>de</strong>monstrated for acupuncture and spinal manipulations 61 .<br />

There is an increased att<strong>en</strong>tion in the medical literature for the usefulness and<br />

importance of placebo effects in clinical practice, and the role it plays wh<strong>en</strong> addressing<br />

pain, like its role in <strong>en</strong>hancing the effect of analgesics that have a prov<strong>en</strong> effect beyond<br />

placebo, the role of provi<strong>de</strong>r knowledge and beliefs wh<strong>en</strong> administering pain killers. 62 .<br />

Hróbjartsson A & Gøtzsche 63 did a meta-analysis and meta-regression to measure the<br />

effect of placebos and found that it was heterog<strong>en</strong>eous and that the effect <strong>de</strong>p<strong>en</strong><strong>de</strong>d on<br />

the type and credibility of the placebo. For instance, placebos involving a form of<br />

physical contact were more effective wh<strong>en</strong> used for pain relief.<br />

However, measuring the effect of placebo is complicated due to differ<strong>en</strong>tial drop out,<br />

poor acceptability of ‘waiting list type’ control groups and coping mechanism of suffering<br />

pati<strong>en</strong>ts such as self medication or other forms of health seeking behavior.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!