13.08.2013 Views

Asset Pricing John H. Cochrane June 12, 2000

Asset Pricing John H. Cochrane June 12, 2000

Asset Pricing John H. Cochrane June 12, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State 2<br />

Payoff<br />

SECTION 3.5 STATE DIAGRAM AND PRICE FUNCTION<br />

pc<br />

Riskfree rate<br />

Price = 0 (excess returns)<br />

Price = 1 (returns)<br />

State 1 contingent claim<br />

Price = 2<br />

Figure 7. Contingent claims prices (pc) and payoffs.<br />

State 1 Payoff<br />

gent claim price vector. We reasoned above that the price of the payoff x must be given by its<br />

contingent claim value (3.48),<br />

p(x) = X<br />

pc(s)x(s). (50)<br />

s<br />

Interpreting pc and x as vectors, this means that the price is given by the inner product of the<br />

contingent claim price and the payoff.<br />

If two vectors are orthogonal – if they point out from the origin at right angles to each<br />

other – then their inner product is zero. Therefore, the set of all zero price payoffs must lie<br />

on a plane orthogonal to the contingent claims price vector, as shown in figure 7.<br />

More generally, the inner product of two vectors x and pc equals the product of the magnitude<br />

of the projection of x onto pc times the magnitude of pc. Using a dot to denote inner<br />

product,<br />

p(x) = X<br />

pc(s)x(s) =pc · x = |pc|×|proj(x|pc)| = |pc|×|x|×cos(θ)<br />

s<br />

where |x| means the length of the vector x and θ is the angle between the vectors pc and<br />

x. Since all payoffs on planes (such as the price planes in figure 7) that are perpendicular<br />

to pc havethesameprojectionontopc, they must have the same price. (Only the price = 0<br />

plane is, strictly speaking, orthogonal to pc. Lacking a better term, I’ve called the nonzero<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!