14.08.2013 Views

Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council

Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council

Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROPOSED EXTENSIONS AT 7 ASSESSMENT OF PLANNING AND RETAIL ISSUES<br />

BRAEHEAD RETAIL PARK MAY 2010<br />

2.11 Paragraph 63 <strong>of</strong> the SPP explains that development proposals in edge-<strong>of</strong>-centre<br />

or commercial centre locations should be assessed having regard to the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> more central locations <strong>and</strong> the potential impact on existing centres. In relation<br />

to new developments which are contrary to the development plan, the planning<br />

authority should ensure that the sequential approach to retail site selection has<br />

been used, there is no unacceptable individual or cumulative impact on the vitality<br />

<strong>and</strong> viability <strong>of</strong> the identified network <strong>of</strong> centres, the proposal will help to meet<br />

qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative deficiencies identified in the development plan, <strong>and</strong> will<br />

not conflict with other significant objectives <strong>of</strong> the development plan or other<br />

relevant strategies. A retail impact analysis is required for a development<br />

proposed outside a town centre which is not in accord with the development plan.<br />

2.12 All the relevant issues raised by the SPP are addressed as part <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the current proposals against the requirements <strong>of</strong> the development<br />

plan.<br />

Glasgow <strong>and</strong> The Clyde Valley Structure Plan<br />

2.13 The Third Alteration to the Glasgow <strong>and</strong> The Clyde Valley Structure Plan was<br />

approved with modifications by Ministers in 2008, but was then altered again by<br />

the Fourth Alteration, approved by Ministers in March 2009. This Fourth<br />

Alteration had the effect <strong>of</strong> designating Braehead as a ‘Commercial Centre’,<br />

meaning that - for the purposes <strong>of</strong> applying the sequential approach - Braehead is<br />

a third choice location for new development after town centres <strong>and</strong> edge-<strong>of</strong>centre<br />

locations, but in preference to out-<strong>of</strong>-centre locations.<br />

2.14 However, so far as proposals to exp<strong>and</strong> existing facilities are concerned, paragraph<br />

62 <strong>of</strong> the SPP makes clear that the sequential approach only applies if the<br />

extension proposals “are <strong>of</strong> a scale or form sufficient to change their role <strong>and</strong><br />

function”. In this case the proposals involve only two relatively modest extensions<br />

at either end <strong>of</strong> the existing run <strong>of</strong> buildings, in order to improve the ability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

retail park to respond to a highly competitive marketplace, accommodate interest<br />

from retailers who otherwise are likely to choose to locate outside <strong>Renfrewshire</strong>,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to cater for the evolving needs <strong>of</strong> existing tenants. The proposals are not <strong>of</strong><br />

a scale or form sufficient to change the role <strong>and</strong> function <strong>of</strong> the retail park, or <strong>of</strong><br />

Braehead as a whole, <strong>and</strong> accordingly the sequential approach does not apply in<br />

this instance.<br />

2.15 In any case it is clear that it would not be possible to enhance the retail park or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!