Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council
Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council
Assessment of Planning and Retail Issues - Renfrewshire Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PROPOSED EXTENSIONS AT 7 ASSESSMENT OF PLANNING AND RETAIL ISSUES<br />
BRAEHEAD RETAIL PARK MAY 2010<br />
2.11 Paragraph 63 <strong>of</strong> the SPP explains that development proposals in edge-<strong>of</strong>-centre<br />
or commercial centre locations should be assessed having regard to the availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> more central locations <strong>and</strong> the potential impact on existing centres. In relation<br />
to new developments which are contrary to the development plan, the planning<br />
authority should ensure that the sequential approach to retail site selection has<br />
been used, there is no unacceptable individual or cumulative impact on the vitality<br />
<strong>and</strong> viability <strong>of</strong> the identified network <strong>of</strong> centres, the proposal will help to meet<br />
qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative deficiencies identified in the development plan, <strong>and</strong> will<br />
not conflict with other significant objectives <strong>of</strong> the development plan or other<br />
relevant strategies. A retail impact analysis is required for a development<br />
proposed outside a town centre which is not in accord with the development plan.<br />
2.12 All the relevant issues raised by the SPP are addressed as part <strong>of</strong> the following<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> the current proposals against the requirements <strong>of</strong> the development<br />
plan.<br />
Glasgow <strong>and</strong> The Clyde Valley Structure Plan<br />
2.13 The Third Alteration to the Glasgow <strong>and</strong> The Clyde Valley Structure Plan was<br />
approved with modifications by Ministers in 2008, but was then altered again by<br />
the Fourth Alteration, approved by Ministers in March 2009. This Fourth<br />
Alteration had the effect <strong>of</strong> designating Braehead as a ‘Commercial Centre’,<br />
meaning that - for the purposes <strong>of</strong> applying the sequential approach - Braehead is<br />
a third choice location for new development after town centres <strong>and</strong> edge-<strong>of</strong>centre<br />
locations, but in preference to out-<strong>of</strong>-centre locations.<br />
2.14 However, so far as proposals to exp<strong>and</strong> existing facilities are concerned, paragraph<br />
62 <strong>of</strong> the SPP makes clear that the sequential approach only applies if the<br />
extension proposals “are <strong>of</strong> a scale or form sufficient to change their role <strong>and</strong><br />
function”. In this case the proposals involve only two relatively modest extensions<br />
at either end <strong>of</strong> the existing run <strong>of</strong> buildings, in order to improve the ability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
retail park to respond to a highly competitive marketplace, accommodate interest<br />
from retailers who otherwise are likely to choose to locate outside <strong>Renfrewshire</strong>,<br />
<strong>and</strong> to cater for the evolving needs <strong>of</strong> existing tenants. The proposals are not <strong>of</strong><br />
a scale or form sufficient to change the role <strong>and</strong> function <strong>of</strong> the retail park, or <strong>of</strong><br />
Braehead as a whole, <strong>and</strong> accordingly the sequential approach does not apply in<br />
this instance.<br />
2.15 In any case it is clear that it would not be possible to enhance the retail park or