26.08.2013 Views

Finance for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - DTI Home Page

Finance for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - DTI Home Page

Finance for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - DTI Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Finance</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Small</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Medium</strong>-<strong>Sized</strong> <strong>Enterprises</strong>: A Report on the 2004 UK Survey of SME <strong>Finance</strong>s<br />

14. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FINANCES<br />

We conclude the analysis in this report by looking at the relationships between<br />

the<br />

different <strong>for</strong>ms of finance analyzed individually<br />

in previous sections. In particular,<br />

the<br />

aim here is to investigate:<br />

• The types of finance which are more likely to be used as alternatives to<br />

each other (substitute finances). These are finances which are in<br />

competition with each other, since a rise in the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> one implies a fall<br />

in the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> the other.<br />

• The types of finances which are more likely to be used in conjunction with<br />

each other (complementary finances). These finances are not in competition<br />

with each other since a rise in the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> one also implies a rise in the<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> the other.<br />

To<br />

achieve this analysis models, relating the probability of using one source of<br />

finance to other sources<br />

(controlling <strong>for</strong> owner, business, regional <strong>and</strong> industry<br />

characteristics),<br />

are estimated. A positive relationship between finances is indicative<br />

that these finances are complements; a negative relationship suggests the finances<br />

are<br />

possible substitutes <strong>for</strong> one another.<br />

Cruickshank (2000) reports that only 29% of firms considered alternatives to their<br />

main source of finance (usually a term loan or overdraft). The alternative tended to be<br />

the other traditional bank<br />

debt product from the one chosen, rather than less<br />

traditional<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms such as asset <strong>and</strong> asset-based finance. Even fewer firms considered<br />

equity finance as an alternative to their main source. Cruickshank took this as<br />

evidence that: the market <strong>for</strong> traditional bank debt is distinct from the market <strong>for</strong> other<br />

debt<br />

products; <strong>and</strong> that competition from other debt products, <strong>and</strong> equity, have only a<br />

limited restraint on traditional bank debt prices.<br />

Estimates of the relationships between finances, based on probit models<br />

relating<br />

the<br />

use of various finances, are reported in the following<br />

table. These<br />

estimates, by<br />

controlling <strong>for</strong> the influences of business <strong>and</strong> owner charact eristics on the use of<br />

finances, represent the underlying<br />

relationships between finances.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!