Finance for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - DTI Home Page
Finance for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - DTI Home Page
Finance for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - DTI Home Page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Finance</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Small</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Medium</strong>-<strong>Sized</strong> <strong>Enterprises</strong>: A Report on the 2004 UK Survey of SME <strong>Finance</strong>s<br />
where it supplies<br />
other <strong>for</strong>ms of debt. Analysis of the number of different financial<br />
products,<br />
supplied by the main provider, is given later in this section.<br />
Market shares<br />
Now we turn to an analysis of market shares based<br />
on data provided by businesses<br />
about their main provider of finance.<br />
of marke<br />
dicates that the market we are looking at here is, principally, <strong>for</strong> liquidity<br />
nt services.<br />
42 In the following charts we report the degree<br />
t concentration among the largest four providers. The previous analysis<br />
in<br />
manageme<br />
In the following chart we look at the market shares of the top four providers in the UK<br />
Figure 6.1: Market Shares of Largest Four Providers (UK)<br />
22%<br />
Top Four Providers Other Providers<br />
Base: All SMEs N P = 3,625,416 (Unweighted N=2,500)<br />
This chart indicates that<br />
• The largest four providers account <strong>for</strong> almost 80% of the market.<br />
In addition (not reported in Figure 6.1)<br />
• The largest provider is the main provider to 1 in 4 SMEs.<br />
• The two largest providers account <strong>for</strong> 42% of the market.<br />
In comparison, Cruickshank (2000), using bank data on the value of loans <strong>and</strong><br />
overdrafts,<br />
estimated that the top four banks account <strong>for</strong> 83% of the market. Our<br />
figure of 78% is indicative of a slight fall in market concentration. 43<br />
42<br />
In contra st, previous analyses of market share have used bank data (see e.g., Cruickshank, 2000)<br />
43<br />
Whilst our figure is (statistically) significantly smaller than Cruickshank’s figure, it would be<br />
incorrect to infer that the top four market share has fallen 5 points, due to the different methods of<br />
calculating market shares.<br />
78%<br />
72