Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition
Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition
Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
170 LOYALTY AND THE CROWN<br />
in the July 1917 number of English Review, had advocated the<br />
establishment of an Irish republic within the British Empire,<br />
however contradictory this appeared. MacNeill argued that ‘The<br />
right <strong>and</strong> wise thing for Engl<strong>and</strong> to do is consent freely, <strong>and</strong><br />
without grudge…to the establishment of an Irish Republic<br />
unconditionally’. 42<br />
The Irish Party totally opposed Sinn Fein’s public claim for a<br />
republic. Commenting on MacNeill’s proposal, the Freeman’s<br />
Journal remarked that the ‘idealist’ always had an advantage in<br />
political controversy until the moment came to apply to him the<br />
test of practical accomplishment. Sinn Fein, it claimed, drew full<br />
advantage by preaching principles that might in the abstract be<br />
incontrovertible, but which possessed the fatal defect of being<br />
unreasonable. 43 After de Valera had variously stated that if the<br />
Orangemen continued as the tools of Engl<strong>and</strong> ‘we must make up<br />
our minds to fight them’, 44 that ‘they would have to go under’, 45<br />
for it was they who were the seceders, the rebels <strong>and</strong> ‘we would<br />
find an Abraham Lincoln who would know how to deal with<br />
them’, 46 the Freeman Journal asked what moral right did de Valera<br />
have to ‘kick’ Ulstermen, who objected to the separation of <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong><br />
from the Empire, out of <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>? The root cause of <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s<br />
troubles, it decided, were to be found two <strong>and</strong> a half centuries<br />
before, at the Battle of the Boyne, when Irishmen had fought one<br />
another over the respective merits of two ‘English’ Kings. The<br />
Freeman queried whether, even if Nationalists could beat Engl<strong>and</strong><br />
to her knees <strong>and</strong> erect a republic, it would be worth the cost of their<br />
northern countrymen’s blood <strong>and</strong> their everlasting spirit of revolt?<br />
The Freeman remained unconvinced that Ulster would fight<br />
against an Irish constitution within the Empire, but ‘our scepticism<br />
on that point is equalled by our conviction that Ulster would <strong>and</strong> will<br />
fight against separation’ from the Empire. 47 As one Irish Party<br />
supporter explained, it was not only Unionists who wished to<br />
retain an imperial connection; he asked:<br />
Why are there loyal Home Rulers in <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>? Why are there<br />
Imperial Nationalists in <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>?… Why are there patriotic Irish<br />
people bitterly opposed to the Sinn Fein policy in <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>? Why<br />
are there Irish Nationalists who want to take a place ‘within<br />
the Empire’? Here is the psychology of their new friendship<br />
for the Empire…. Our pro-Imperialism <strong>and</strong> anti-Sinn Feinism<br />
is, at bottom, pro-Irishism…. It is not because we prefer this<br />
policy or attitude to any other, but the necessity of<br />
circumstances forces us into that outlook of policy It is<br />
the maximum we can expect until the navy of the…Empire is