15.09.2013 Views

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 IRELAND IN 1914<br />

take the offer seriously if the time limit were removed, declaring<br />

that Ulster would not accept a sentence of death with a stay of<br />

execution for six years. 2 After Carson’s rejection of the six-years’<br />

compromise, British army authorities were instructed to reinforce<br />

troops in Ulster. The military authorities decided, because of<br />

widespread sympathy within the army for the Ulster Unionist cause,<br />

that officers whose military homes were in Ulster need not be<br />

involved in any measures which might result in their fighting<br />

friends <strong>and</strong> relatives, but that they might ‘disappear’ for the<br />

course of any operations. General Paget, Comm<strong>and</strong>er-in-Chief in<br />

<strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>, delivered a confused version of these instructions to his<br />

senior officers, implicitly giving those who could not claim Ulster<br />

residence a choice between obedience or dismissal without<br />

pension. The result was that the <strong>War</strong> Office’s plans for possible<br />

operations against Ulster came to be seen as plans for an<br />

offensive. After consultations, General Gough <strong>and</strong> fifty-seven of<br />

his cavalry officers stationed at the Curragh declared that while<br />

they were prepared to maintain order in Ulster they would prefer<br />

to be dismissed than to be involved in starting hostilities. After the<br />

Curragh crisis, the Government had little confidence that it could<br />

use the army to crush a UVF rising.<br />

On 25 May 1914, the Home Rule Bill passed through the<br />

Commons for the third time <strong>and</strong> needed only the King’s signature<br />

to become law. The Government held firm <strong>and</strong> offered to the<br />

House of Lords an Amending Bill identical to that rejected by<br />

Carson on 9 March. In July, the Lords returned the Bill after<br />

modifying it by proposing the exclusion of all nine Ulster counties,<br />

forever. Later that month, a round table meeting of two leaders<br />

from each of the British <strong>and</strong> Irish parties met in Buckingham<br />

Palace, at the invitation of the King. Despite protests from Carson<br />

<strong>and</strong> the leader of the British Unionist Party, Andrew Bonar Law, the<br />

discussions dealt only with the question of which area was to be<br />

excluded, with no talk of how long such exclusion would last.<br />

Redmond argued that there were more Catholics in the Ulster<br />

counties of Londonderry <strong>and</strong> Armagh than there were Protestants<br />

in Fermanagh <strong>and</strong> Tyrone, <strong>and</strong> over 100,000 more Catholics in the<br />

four ‘Protestant’ counties than there were Protestants in the five<br />

‘Catholic’ counties, so making the Government’s compromise an<br />

advantage to Unionists rather than Nationalists. But Carson<br />

rejected this asking how ‘men in one county are going to ab<strong>and</strong>on<br />

men in another county just because there may be a majority here<br />

or a majority there’. Carson insisted that what he (mistakenly)<br />

termed the six Ulster plantation counties of Antrim, Armagh,<br />

Down, Fermanagh, Londonderry <strong>and</strong> Tyrone, should be excluded

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!