15.09.2013 Views

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LOYALTY AND THE CROWN 185<br />

<strong>and</strong> Wales. Those he called the ‘Gaelic Irish’ had to make it plain<br />

that they loyally accepted <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s position in the British Empire,<br />

while those he termed the ‘British Irish’ had to make it equally<br />

plain that they were inspired by a genuine <strong>and</strong> enlightened Irish<br />

patriotic spirit, <strong>and</strong> were willing to place their time, talents <strong>and</strong><br />

energies at their country’s service. 77<br />

Many Southern Unionists believed that the common Irishness of<br />

Unionists <strong>and</strong> Nationalists could form the basis for a compromise<br />

if the republicanism of Sinn Fein was dispensed with. In the Church<br />

of <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> Gazette, an ‘Anglo-Irishman’, in early 1917, emphasised<br />

a common cultural Irishness when he asked other Unionists to<br />

recognise that the present merits of the Union were not called into<br />

question by a recognition that Irish history consisted of protest<br />

<strong>and</strong> resistance to a monstrous political aggression <strong>and</strong> economic<br />

oppression in earlier centuries. Englishmen, argued the writer,<br />

were not invited to be loyal to the United Kingdom, but first to<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong>, their own nationality, not a political collaboration of<br />

nations. He asked if Irishmen were to be submitted to a different<br />

test of loyalty, holding that the ‘authentic flower of Irish loyalty to<br />

the community of nations which is the Empire can blossom only<br />

from a native soil; it must have its roots in <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> in Irish<br />

history’. 78 This would involve Irish Unionists declaring, as did Lord<br />

Meath in 1918, ‘I am an Imperialist, it is true, but I am an Irishman<br />

first <strong>and</strong> an Imperialist afterwards’. 79 As the Bishop of Ossory<br />

explained to worshippers in late 1917, accepting some form of<br />

home rule would involve a shift from Unionism to Loyalism which<br />

could be accommodated within an allegiance to the Crown, <strong>and</strong>,<br />

consequently, British subjectship:<br />

I want to reassure the minds of those who are uneasy on a<br />

certain point, namely, whether loyalty to the King will not be<br />

compromised by acquiescence in the new state of things….<br />

<strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> is not going to be a Republic, any more than it was a<br />

Republic before the Union. If duly constituted authority gives<br />

<strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> a new form of government, the true loyalty is to accept<br />

it, <strong>and</strong> to do our very utmost to make a success of it. Loyalty<br />

to the Crown <strong>and</strong> Unionism are not necessarily equivalent<br />

terms. There was loyalty in <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> before the Union—there<br />

was loyalty which vehemently deprecated the Union; <strong>and</strong><br />

there can be loyalty still if the Union is legally dissolved….<br />

Before the Union…<strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> was acknowledged as being one<br />

distinct Kingdom of several <strong>and</strong> not merely as a constituent<br />

part of one larger Kingdom…. The dissolution of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!