15.09.2013 Views

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 LOYALTY AND THE CROWN<br />

identity of all Unionists. In Ulster, after the Easter Rising, the<br />

Fermanagh Times had exclaimed:<br />

It is just as we have affirmed time after time…an ‘Irish<br />

Republic’ with which the authorities will for the future have to<br />

deal…. The golden cord of the Crown is to be severed. Away<br />

with the Sassanach, <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> for the Irish—these are the things<br />

that alone concern the masses now…. The dem<strong>and</strong> for an<br />

Irish Republic that now dominates the [Dublin] city mobs…is<br />

being taken up…from the centre to the circumference…<br />

‘Saxon curs’, ‘Saxon dogs’, ‘Saxon brutes’ were the phrases<br />

with which…the city populace refreshed itself…. Well, after<br />

all, it is better so. The real sentiments that pervade the<br />

patriots may yet filter into the dense underst<strong>and</strong>ings of the<br />

British electorate. It will be a slow process for we have no high<br />

opinion of the penetrability of the average brain across the<br />

Channel. 67<br />

All Unionists totally rejected Sinn Fein’s hostility to <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s<br />

participation in the war <strong>and</strong> allegiance to the British Crown.<br />

Considering Darrel Figgis’ Catechism, Hugh de Fellenburg<br />

Montgomery, taking it section by section, argued:<br />

An Irishman may give his ‘true <strong>and</strong> best service’ to <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> in<br />

many ways, but <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> not being a nation in the sense in<br />

which Engl<strong>and</strong>, Scotl<strong>and</strong>, France, Spain &c…are nations this<br />

talk of loyalty to <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> is essentially nonsense…still more<br />

obviously nonsense is the statement that a man belonging to<br />

one country cannot be loyal to another country to whom he is<br />

bound by honour or by interest to be loyal.<br />

At the present time every Englishman is bound to be loyal<br />

to France, Italy, America, Belgium, Serbia &c, <strong>and</strong> every<br />

Frenchman is bound to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>, Italy, America &c,<br />

<strong>and</strong> so forth.<br />

Irishmen are not asked to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>; they are<br />

required to be loyal to the United Kingdom of Great Britain<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>, of which they are de facto <strong>and</strong> de jure citizens<br />

<strong>and</strong> subjects. It would however be perfectly reasonable to ask<br />

any Irishman to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>, because it is in his<br />

interest to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>, Engl<strong>and</strong> being his best <strong>and</strong><br />

chief customer for everything he produces…. The fact that<br />

certain Irishmen are found who desire to rebel, with the object<br />

of breaking up the Union between the three kingdoms, does<br />

not contradict the fact that <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> was conquered <strong>and</strong> partly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!