Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition
Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition
Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
180 LOYALTY AND THE CROWN<br />
identity of all Unionists. In Ulster, after the Easter Rising, the<br />
Fermanagh Times had exclaimed:<br />
It is just as we have affirmed time after time…an ‘Irish<br />
Republic’ with which the authorities will for the future have to<br />
deal…. The golden cord of the Crown is to be severed. Away<br />
with the Sassanach, <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> for the Irish—these are the things<br />
that alone concern the masses now…. The dem<strong>and</strong> for an<br />
Irish Republic that now dominates the [Dublin] city mobs…is<br />
being taken up…from the centre to the circumference…<br />
‘Saxon curs’, ‘Saxon dogs’, ‘Saxon brutes’ were the phrases<br />
with which…the city populace refreshed itself…. Well, after<br />
all, it is better so. The real sentiments that pervade the<br />
patriots may yet filter into the dense underst<strong>and</strong>ings of the<br />
British electorate. It will be a slow process for we have no high<br />
opinion of the penetrability of the average brain across the<br />
Channel. 67<br />
All Unionists totally rejected Sinn Fein’s hostility to <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s<br />
participation in the war <strong>and</strong> allegiance to the British Crown.<br />
Considering Darrel Figgis’ Catechism, Hugh de Fellenburg<br />
Montgomery, taking it section by section, argued:<br />
An Irishman may give his ‘true <strong>and</strong> best service’ to <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> in<br />
many ways, but <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> not being a nation in the sense in<br />
which Engl<strong>and</strong>, Scotl<strong>and</strong>, France, Spain &c…are nations this<br />
talk of loyalty to <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> is essentially nonsense…still more<br />
obviously nonsense is the statement that a man belonging to<br />
one country cannot be loyal to another country to whom he is<br />
bound by honour or by interest to be loyal.<br />
At the present time every Englishman is bound to be loyal<br />
to France, Italy, America, Belgium, Serbia &c, <strong>and</strong> every<br />
Frenchman is bound to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>, Italy, America &c,<br />
<strong>and</strong> so forth.<br />
Irishmen are not asked to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>; they are<br />
required to be loyal to the United Kingdom of Great Britain<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>, of which they are de facto <strong>and</strong> de jure citizens<br />
<strong>and</strong> subjects. It would however be perfectly reasonable to ask<br />
any Irishman to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>, because it is in his<br />
interest to be loyal to Engl<strong>and</strong>, Engl<strong>and</strong> being his best <strong>and</strong><br />
chief customer for everything he produces…. The fact that<br />
certain Irishmen are found who desire to rebel, with the object<br />
of breaking up the Union between the three kingdoms, does<br />
not contradict the fact that <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> was conquered <strong>and</strong> partly