15.09.2013 Views

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

Dividing Ireland: World War I and Partition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

190 LOYALTY AND THE CROWN<br />

isl<strong>and</strong>, inhabited by a population of common descent, <strong>and</strong><br />

speaking a common language. <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> is an isl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> its<br />

people, before Strongbow, may be said to have spoken a<br />

common language…. I am willing…to accept the popular<br />

belief in the community of race <strong>and</strong> of tongue; what I cannot<br />

get over is the diversity of political sovereignty. Ulster,<br />

Munster, Leinster, Connaught <strong>and</strong> Meath were distinct<br />

political units. It is true that every now <strong>and</strong> then some prince<br />

or other claimed to be King of All <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>; but not one of them<br />

—not even Brian Boru himself—ever really exercised sovereign<br />

power…. That is why I deny that Nationality has any claim to<br />

be an Irish ideal. The geographical, non-political unit called<br />

<strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> never was a nation. For seven hundred years…it has<br />

been a dependency of Engl<strong>and</strong>. Scotl<strong>and</strong>, though not a<br />

geographical unit, was a political unit…. Though there are<br />

Scottish ideals, Home Rule <strong>and</strong> Repeal of the Union are not<br />

among them. What is good enough for Mac ought to be good<br />

enough for O’—at least, so I think; <strong>and</strong> my name will tell you<br />

that I am Scottish by race, though Irish by birth <strong>and</strong><br />

residence. 100<br />

Asking ‘what constitutes a nation?’, the Belfast News-Letter agreed<br />

that if <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> were to be allowed to self-determine itself out of the<br />

United Kingdom, then why should not Ulster self-determine itself<br />

out of <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>? If the principle of self-determination were accepted<br />

absolutely it would mean the break-up of every state in the world,<br />

warned the News-Letter, <strong>and</strong> constant wars between minorities<br />

<strong>and</strong> majorities everywhere. Thus there could be no absolute right<br />

of self-determination, <strong>and</strong> if the right was not absolute then it did<br />

not exist at all. <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>, for example, had not the right to become<br />

independent because it was not a nation but a part of a nation, the<br />

British nation, <strong>and</strong> since <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s claim to home rule depended<br />

upon the Imperial Parliament <strong>and</strong> the United Kingdom’s electorate,<br />

that authority <strong>and</strong> no other had the right to define the powers to<br />

be granted. 101<br />

J.R.Fisher claimed that too much should not be made of Ulster’s<br />

argument for ‘self-determination’, since this had always been used<br />

by Unionists as a ‘second line of defence’. His own view was that if<br />

the British people in Parliament assembled accepted that <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>,<br />

owing to religious, racial, historical <strong>and</strong> social reasons, had a right<br />

to separate treatment from Engl<strong>and</strong>, then Ulster had the right to<br />

claim separate treatment from the rest of <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>. Previously the<br />

argument had been used simply as a reductio ad absurdum, but<br />

recently it had come into practical politics as an alternative to civil

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!