26.10.2013 Views

Final Second Five-Year Review Report Fort Ord Superfund Site ...

Final Second Five-Year Review Report Fort Ord Superfund Site ...

Final Second Five-Year Review Report Fort Ord Superfund Site ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Drilling 23 borings to depths of 15 to 20 feet bgs on an approximate 50-foot grid<br />

• Collecting 69 surface and subsurface soil samples for lithologic characterization and chemical and<br />

physical analysis<br />

• Analysis of soil samples for explosive compounds and priority pollutant metals.<br />

The findings of the field investigations at Range 36A indicated the following:<br />

• The explosive compounds cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine (HMX) and RDX were present at low<br />

levels (maximum concentrations of 1.84 and 16.5 mg/kg, respectively), were generally limited to<br />

shallow soil, and were below PRGs. The PRG for HMX is 803 mg/kg and the PRG for RDX is 4.4<br />

mg/kg.<br />

With the exception of beryllium detected at a maximum concentration 0.89 mg/kg in shallow soil, metals<br />

in soil at the site were below background or PRG concentrations. The <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Ord</strong> PRG for beryllium is 0.39<br />

mg/kg. The most recent EPA Region 9 PRG for beryllium is 150 mg/kg.<br />

Additional sampling was conducted in 2004 to investigate the areas used after the previous investigations<br />

and to verify the presence of RDX above the PRG. At the request of DTSC, dioxins and perchlorate were<br />

also analyzed. The following items summarize the 2004 investigation:<br />

• Ten soil samples were collected.<br />

• RDX was detected in one sample but at a concentration less than the PRG of 4.4 mg/kg.<br />

• Perchlorate was not detected in any of the soil samples.<br />

Dioxins were detected at low levels (less than the 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin [TCDD] PRG of<br />

3.9E-06 mg/kg) in each of the surface samples. One dioxin congener was detected at soil sample<br />

collected at a depth of 5 feet but at a concentration was less than the 2,3,7,8-TCDD PRG. Additionally,<br />

all calculated TCDD-TE concentrations for dioxins detected in the soil samples were less than the<br />

2,3,7,8-TCDD PRG.<br />

Status <strong>Report</strong><br />

The <strong>Final</strong> RCRA Closure Plan, Range 36A, Former <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Ord</strong>, California (Solid Waste Management Unit<br />

FTO-016) (MACTEC, 2005) was submitted in 2005. This plan was amended after geophysical<br />

investigation revealed widespread metal debris across the whole site. In the amended plan, the Army<br />

proposed to excavate and investigate additional areas to demonstrate with a reasonable probability that<br />

MEC are unlikely to be found at Range 36A. These amended closure procedures will provide sufficient<br />

information to determine whether Range 36A meets the closure performance standards or additional MR<br />

is warranted.<br />

The amended closure activities were completed in February 2007. No MEC was found. The final closure<br />

certification report was submitted in June 2007.<br />

18.1.3 Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs)<br />

Background<br />

In support of <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Ord</strong>’s RCRA Part B permit application, the Army Environmental Hygiene Agency<br />

identified 58 Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMUs) in 1988. All but two of these 58 SWMUs were in<br />

areas investigated during the RI/FS or were previously identified as Operable Units. In 1996, the Army<br />

identified 14 additional SWMUs. The Draft Field Investigation and Data <strong>Review</strong>, Solid Waste<br />

<strong>Final</strong><br />

18-2<br />

FORMER FT ORD 5YR REVIEW 2007_FINAL United States Department of the Army

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!