28.12.2013 Views

Studies in Rings generalised Unique Factorisation Rings

Studies in Rings generalised Unique Factorisation Rings

Studies in Rings generalised Unique Factorisation Rings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-114-<br />

-1 -1<br />

and so a I = R and a a = 1. Thus by the lemma given<br />

above,<br />

<strong>in</strong> a right bounded prime GUFR, every essential<br />

right ideal is projective, which is a partial converse<br />

of theorem ~~44. We do not know whether every right<br />

ideal of a right bounded prime GUFR is projective.<br />

Ano ther question that arose <strong>in</strong> chapter 2 is about<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tegrally closed r<strong>in</strong>gs. We proved that the semiprime<br />

GUFRs are <strong>in</strong>tegrally closed, if every right and<br />

left endomorphisms of Q over R takes the identity<br />

element of Q to R itself. The relevant question is:<br />

If R is a commutative Noetherian UFO, then, is every R<br />

endomorp~ism of Q takes the identity element of Q to R?<br />

(Here Q is the quotient field of R).<br />

The question is<br />

important because <strong>in</strong> the case when R is a commutative<br />

Noetherian UFO,<br />

it is always <strong>in</strong>tegrally closed.<br />

In chapter 3, we proved that the f<strong>in</strong>ite centralis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

extension of a GUFR is a GUFR. The case of f<strong>in</strong>ite normalis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

extension of a GUFR is yet to be proved. Ihe obstacle <strong>in</strong> this<br />

case is that we cannot connect the prime ideals of R with<br />

the prime ideals of a f<strong>in</strong>ite normalis<strong>in</strong>g extension directly.<br />

(lemma 303)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!