28.12.2013 Views

Studies in Rings generalised Unique Factorisation Rings

Studies in Rings generalised Unique Factorisation Rings

Studies in Rings generalised Unique Factorisation Rings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-44-<br />

Proof<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce R is a Noetherian r<strong>in</strong>g and C is a right<br />

and left Ore set, C is a right and left denom<strong>in</strong>ator<br />

set by proposition 1.42. Now T = RC- l = C-1R is a<br />

Noetherian r<strong>in</strong>g by proposition 2 012(1).<br />

By theorem 2.7, T has only a f<strong>in</strong>ite number of<br />

maximal ideals. We prove that they are the m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />

prime ideals of T. Let M be a maximal ideal of T. If<br />

possible assume P is a prime<br />

ideal of T strictly conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> Mo Then pC is strictly conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> MC, (otherwise<br />

o c e<br />

by (4) of proposition 2.12 JP<br />

= (pc) ~ = (M ) = M ). But<br />

M is the extension, <strong>in</strong> T, of some m<strong>in</strong>imal prime ideal<br />

P l<br />

(say) of R. S<strong>in</strong>ce R has an Art<strong>in</strong>ian quotient r<strong>in</strong>g<br />

n<br />

CR(O) = n CR(P.), by proposition 1.62, where P1,P , ... ,P<br />

i=l 1 2 n<br />

are the m<strong>in</strong>imal prime ideals of R. Thus we have<br />

C-fCR(O) 5- CR(P l)<br />

and so, by proposition 2.12(5), there<br />

c<br />

exists a prime ideal Q of T such that PI = Q. Therefore<br />

e<br />

e<br />

M = p e l<br />

= (Qc) , i.e., M = (Mc) = (Qc)e= Q. Consequently<br />

we huve pC < MC = QC = Plo Also pC is a prime ideal of R<br />

by proposition 2.12 (5).<br />

This violates the m<strong>in</strong>imality of Plo<br />

Thus M does not conta<strong>in</strong> any prime ideal properlyo Hence<br />

the maximal ideals of T are the m<strong>in</strong>imal prime ideals which<br />

implies that T has no non m<strong>in</strong>imal prime ideals and thus<br />

T is obviously a GUFR.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!