1 - City of Glendale
1 - City of Glendale
1 - City of Glendale
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Attachment B<br />
To Design Review Board<br />
· Community Development Department<br />
633 E. Broadway Room 103<br />
<strong>Glendale</strong>, CA 91206<br />
DRB Case No. 2-PDR-1301725-A<br />
The new proposed project, does not meet the guideline put forth by the<br />
2009 case decision. The new architectural group has reduced the square footage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the house on 2064 Buckingham Place by about 400 sq ft from previous<br />
designed but they failed to meet the city council requirements to make the<br />
design less intrusive and reduce-mass and scale. The new dwelling is going to<br />
be a massive obstruction to any light coming into our westen1 windows. It is<br />
still blocking light and view from the upstairs bedrooms, changes are<br />
insignificant, even though they presented as such.<br />
The we stem facing slope <strong>of</strong>fers them a significant piece <strong>of</strong> real estate to<br />
place their expansion on yet they have chosen to erect the entire expansion in<br />
one small spot <strong>of</strong> their lot; tllis is the issue at heart. The new design is about<br />
three feet taller than the previous design thus making it too bull)'. At no point<br />
did the design group visit our property to see what the proposed project might<br />
look W'e from our windows. Had they visited our property, it would have been<br />
clear that raising the ro<strong>of</strong>line 3 feet higher than the previous proposal that was<br />
rejected for bulk and intrusiveness was not a good idea.<br />
The design group either did not understand the recommendation put forth in<br />
the 2009 case or chose to ignore it.<br />
We are not opposed to our neighbors renovating their home. What we are<br />
against is their doing tllis at such a high price to our own home and<br />
neighborhood. At 3,400 square feet this design is not just largest home, but JOy<br />
f~u hu·geB.' than the 2,200 square foot average for our neighborhood. Even today<br />
that house is not the smallest one. The expansion is an almost fifty a)er«=ent<br />
increase in square footage from the current dwelling; this is by no means a<br />
modest change.<br />
The opponents may argue that they have one <strong>of</strong> the few houses in tl1e<br />
neighborhood that does not have a second floor which entitles them to being<br />
able to build that.<br />
1