30.12.2013 Views

1 - City of Glendale

1 - City of Glendale

1 - City of Glendale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Attachment B<br />

To Design Review Board<br />

· Community Development Department<br />

633 E. Broadway Room 103<br />

<strong>Glendale</strong>, CA 91206<br />

DRB Case No. 2-PDR-1301725-A<br />

The new proposed project, does not meet the guideline put forth by the<br />

2009 case decision. The new architectural group has reduced the square footage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the house on 2064 Buckingham Place by about 400 sq ft from previous<br />

designed but they failed to meet the city council requirements to make the<br />

design less intrusive and reduce-mass and scale. The new dwelling is going to<br />

be a massive obstruction to any light coming into our westen1 windows. It is<br />

still blocking light and view from the upstairs bedrooms, changes are<br />

insignificant, even though they presented as such.<br />

The we stem facing slope <strong>of</strong>fers them a significant piece <strong>of</strong> real estate to<br />

place their expansion on yet they have chosen to erect the entire expansion in<br />

one small spot <strong>of</strong> their lot; tllis is the issue at heart. The new design is about<br />

three feet taller than the previous design thus making it too bull)'. At no point<br />

did the design group visit our property to see what the proposed project might<br />

look W'e from our windows. Had they visited our property, it would have been<br />

clear that raising the ro<strong>of</strong>line 3 feet higher than the previous proposal that was<br />

rejected for bulk and intrusiveness was not a good idea.<br />

The design group either did not understand the recommendation put forth in<br />

the 2009 case or chose to ignore it.<br />

We are not opposed to our neighbors renovating their home. What we are<br />

against is their doing tllis at such a high price to our own home and<br />

neighborhood. At 3,400 square feet this design is not just largest home, but JOy<br />

f~u hu·geB.' than the 2,200 square foot average for our neighborhood. Even today<br />

that house is not the smallest one. The expansion is an almost fifty a)er«=ent<br />

increase in square footage from the current dwelling; this is by no means a<br />

modest change.<br />

The opponents may argue that they have one <strong>of</strong> the few houses in tl1e<br />

neighborhood that does not have a second floor which entitles them to being<br />

able to build that.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!