30.12.2013 Views

1 - City of Glendale

1 - City of Glendale

1 - City of Glendale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The current proposal features a more contemporary Ranch style with a gabled ro<strong>of</strong> to match<br />

the residences in the neighborhood. The proposed overall two-story building height is 28' is<br />

well below Code limits (maximum building height in the R1R zone is 32 feet, with an<br />

additional three feet for pitched ro<strong>of</strong>s). During the ORB meeting, certain Boardmembers<br />

pointed out the potential to modify the ceiling and ro<strong>of</strong> design and required that the overall<br />

ro<strong>of</strong> height be lowered by two feet (Exhibit #4). Therefore, as conditioned, the overall height<br />

for the pitched ro<strong>of</strong> will be 26 feet. This condition height would result in a house that is<br />

compatible with the two-story homes along the north side <strong>of</strong> Buckingham Place and also<br />

help to slightly reduce the visual impact <strong>of</strong> the addition with regards to the appellant's views<br />

from their bedroom windows.<br />

The appellant repeatedly states that the proposed project does not address the recommendations<br />

made by the <strong>City</strong> Council during the last appeal in 2009.<br />

Staff's Response:<br />

The <strong>City</strong> Council cited that the previous project was not compatible with the neighborhood in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> mass and scale, and design, and that the project resulted in conflicting relationships<br />

with adjacent buildings (Exhibit #7).<br />

The owner hired a new architect who submitted a new design submittal in response to the <strong>City</strong><br />

Council's comments:<br />

• The current project is approximately 700 square feet less in size than the previous<br />

proposal;<br />

• The footprint/size <strong>of</strong> the 2nd story addition has been reduced and shifted away from the<br />

adjacent neighbor to the east; and<br />

• The project has been redesigned in a more contemporary, Ranch-influenced style to<br />

be more compatible with the neighborhood.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

Based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> the appeal and the reasoning above, staff recommends that the <strong>City</strong><br />

Council uphold the ORB decision. The Boardmembers took into account not only the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

home, but also the project's massing, scale, height, setback, landscaping, window placement,<br />

garage location, use <strong>of</strong> material and colors and other architectural design elements in<br />

determining compatibility. The two-story project, as conditioned, appears to be compatible with<br />

the surrounding neighborhood, despite its size, and is a commendable design with high quality<br />

materials and details.<br />

To reiterate the basis <strong>of</strong> the ORB's decision, the Record <strong>of</strong> Decision includes the following:<br />

Site Planning: Minor changes are proposed for the footprint <strong>of</strong> the existing house on the<br />

angled flag lot, yet the overall site planning <strong>of</strong> the site will remain similar to the existing.<br />

Small additions are proposed at the ground level along the south and west elevations, while<br />

a new semi-cantilevered deck is proposed at the rear to provide more flat surface area. The<br />

proposed project is only partially visible from Buckingham Place, and will not be readily<br />

visible from Chevy Chase Drive, given the curvature <strong>of</strong> the street and the building location<br />

atop the steep slope. Except for the slight decrease in existing hardscape and the proposed<br />

rear deck, the landscaping will not be affected and will remain as is, with the exception <strong>of</strong><br />

additional landscaping required to screen the base <strong>of</strong> the new deck. Staff is recommending<br />

that additional landscaping be installed at the base <strong>of</strong> the deck to s<strong>of</strong>ten its appearance.<br />

Overall, the proposed site plan is compatible with the adjacent developments.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!