31.12.2013 Views

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1/29/98 55 C95.3-1991 Revision — 2 nd Draft<br />

10/98 Draft<br />

of leakage probes than calibration in a plane-wave field where the entire probe is more<br />

uni<strong>for</strong>mly illuminated. A careful error analysis of this problem has not been completed,<br />

but it appears that if the maximum probe dimension is less than one-third the smallest<br />

waveguide dimension, the total uncertainty will not exceed ±1 dB [B6, B126].<br />

Fig 4.5 Rectangular Waveguide Calibration System<br />

Figure 4.5 shows how a section of rectangular waveguide can be used <strong>for</strong> calibrations. A<br />

reflectionless load is connected to the output end to prevent st<strong>and</strong>ing waves that would<br />

cause serious errors in the calibration. The probe to be calibrated is usually inserted into<br />

the waveguide through a hole in the side wall (as in Fig 4.5) <strong>and</strong> positioned in the center<br />

of the guide where the field is most nearly uni<strong>for</strong>m. (Entry through the top wall is not<br />

recommended because spurious pickup by the leads that are then aligned with the E-<br />

field is greater.) The access hole should be as small as possible to minimize<br />

perturbation of the field distribution. Equations <strong>for</strong> calculating the field distribution from P n<br />

(the net power delivered to the section) <strong>and</strong> the guide dimensions can be found in [B59,<br />

B86]. The ''equivalent power density'' can be determined in terms of E 2<br />

(not E ·H ) at the center of a rectangular guide in which the width, a, is twice the height,<br />

b, from<br />

2 −1/<br />

2<br />

Pn<br />

W = ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ 4 ⎞⎡<br />

⎟ − ⎛ a ⎠ ⎝ ⎜ λ ⎞ ⎤<br />

2 ⎢1<br />

⎟<br />

⎣ a⎠<br />

⎥<br />

(Eq 4.8)<br />

2 ⎦<br />

A slide <strong>and</strong> slot in the side wall of the guide may be used to evaluate <strong>and</strong> reduce the<br />

uncertainty produced by any st<strong>and</strong>ing wave within the guide. P n is determined in the<br />

same way as P T in Eq 4.1. It is difficult to estimate the total uncertainty of this method<br />

because the field strength at the probe sensor being calibrated will be modified by the<br />

size <strong>and</strong> nature of the probe. The influence of the conductive walls on probe calibration<br />

in a waveguide is analyzed <strong>and</strong> evaluated in [B69]. The error assessment of the probe<br />

voltage <strong>for</strong> dipoles of lengths of 20 <strong>and</strong> 30 mm having terminations of 100 ohms in a<br />

WR430 waveguide is 1% <strong>and</strong> 2.5%, respectively. (The 100 ohm termination impedance<br />

is typical <strong>for</strong> thermocouple, but not <strong>for</strong> diode based probes used <strong>for</strong> microwave oven<br />

leakage measurements). [B126] describes a system that operates from 400 MHz to 600<br />

Copyright © 1998 IEEE. All rights reserved. This is an unapproved IEEE St<strong>and</strong>ards Draft,<br />

subject to change.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!