31.12.2013 Views

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1/29/98 90 C95.3-1991 Revision — 2 nd Draft<br />

10/98 Draft<br />

during each day of laboratory experimentation. There<strong>for</strong>e, a compromise should be<br />

made that provides good SAR data <strong>and</strong> also conserves time. A useful rule of thumb in<br />

deciding when to start another irradiation is to wait until the slope of the cooling curve is<br />

relatively constant, (about 5% of the prior RF-induced rate of temperature rise over the<br />

period to be used <strong>for</strong> the next irradiation), <strong>and</strong> the decrease in temperature be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

irradiation is relatively small compared with the expected irradiation-induced ∆T/∆t.<br />

Repeated experiments using consistent techniques are essential <strong>for</strong> obtaining accurate<br />

results in SAR studies utilizing temperature probes. Finally, after several RF irradiations<br />

of the same object, its temperature may have increased above acceptable limits, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

phantom or biological material may degrade.<br />

The majority of SAR measurements are made using temperature probes. However,<br />

many researchers are not fully aware of the many factors that degrade accuracy of these<br />

measurements. For example, thermodynamic factors will always limit the accuracy <strong>and</strong><br />

precision of SAR measurements as will any uncertainty in the value of the specific heat<br />

capacity of the actual or simulated tissue being evaluated. The specific heat capacity is<br />

often mistakenly cited as that of water (about 15% higher than that of most high-water<br />

content tissue), which, even under optimal usage conditions, leads to uncertainties of at<br />

least ±1 to 2 dB in the local SAR distribution in an object when measured by sampling the<br />

tissue volume with a temperature probe.<br />

5.5.2. SAR Measurement with Miniature Electric-Field Probes.<br />

Miniature isotropic, implantable E-field probes with high impedance feed lines, which<br />

have been commercially available <strong>for</strong> a number of years [Cheung, et al., 1975], have<br />

been used to measure SAR distributions in phantom models <strong>and</strong> in living, anesthetized<br />

animals [C2, C12]. [See also 4.6.1.] These probes have much higher sensitivity than<br />

thermal probes <strong>and</strong> are especially suitable <strong>for</strong> measuring E-fields within simulated or<br />

actual biological tissues of moderate to high water content, i.e., brain <strong>and</strong> muscle. While<br />

it is possible to measure SARs of the order of 1 W/kg using sensitive <strong>and</strong> precise<br />

thermal measurements (∆T/∆t ≈ 0.1 0 C/30 s), it is well within the domain of E-field probes<br />

to measure SARs as low as 10 mW/kg [Balzano, 1995]. SAR can be calculated using<br />

Eq. 5.5 <strong>and</strong> the data in Tables 5.4 <strong>and</strong> 5.5 that show typical values <strong>for</strong> simulated <strong>and</strong><br />

actual tissues.<br />

where:<br />

SAR = 1 2<br />

ωε<br />

0ε"<br />

Eint W/kg<br />

2ρ = σ 2ρ<br />

ρ = mass density (kg/m 3 )<br />

2<br />

E int<br />

(Eq. 5.5)<br />

ε 0 = permittivity of free space (F/m)<br />

ε” = imaginary part of the complex relative permittivity<br />

ω = radian frequency (= 2πf)<br />

σ = conductivity (S/m)<br />

Copyright © 1998 IEEE. All rights reserved. This is an unapproved IEEE St<strong>and</strong>ards Draft,<br />

subject to change.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!