31.12.2013 Views

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

DRAFT Recommended Practice for Measurements and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1/29/98 6 C95.3-1991 Revision — 2 nd Draft<br />

10/98 Draft<br />

Subcommittee 1 on Evaluation Techniques <strong>and</strong> Instrumentation was originally organized<br />

on April 7, 1960, to establish specifications <strong>for</strong> techniques <strong>and</strong> instrumentation used in<br />

evaluating hazardous radio frequency (RF) radiation. In June 1985 the scope was<br />

clarified <strong>and</strong> the purpose was extended to establish specifications <strong>for</strong> techniques <strong>and</strong><br />

instrumentation to be used in evaluating RF hazards to mankind from exposure to<br />

manmade sources of EM radiation or from the exposure of volatile materials <strong>and</strong><br />

explosive devices to such radiation. It is not intended to include infrared, visible,<br />

ultraviolet, or ionizing radiation.<br />

Although the subcommittee's scope includes hazards resulting from exposure of<br />

flammable volatile materials <strong>and</strong> explosive devices to EM radiation, this document is<br />

devoted exclusively to personnel hazards. This is because the necessary specifications<br />

<strong>and</strong> definitions pertaining to fuels <strong>and</strong> explosive devices are still being developed, <strong>and</strong><br />

there are implications that the instrumentation requirements may be substantially<br />

different from those addressed here. However, the measurement techniques <strong>and</strong><br />

instruments described here are applicable to the measurement of fields in the vicinity of<br />

flammable materials <strong>and</strong> explosive devices, even though exposure st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> these<br />

situations have not been established.<br />

1.2 Frequency Range.<br />

The techniques <strong>and</strong> instrumentation specified herein are useful <strong>for</strong> field measurements<br />

over the frequency range of approximately 300 kHz to 100 GHz. 3 No single<br />

measurement technique or instrumentation arrangement is valid over the wide frequency<br />

range covered by this recommended practice. In general, measurement techniques <strong>and</strong><br />

instrumentation developed <strong>for</strong> use in the frequency range above about 300 MHz only<br />

measure the electric field strength. Magnetic field strength measurements are, however,<br />

required to evaluate near field hazardous situations at frequencies below 30 MHz. Here,<br />

measurement of both the electric <strong>and</strong> the magnetic field strength is required within one<br />

wavelength of the source. A series of commercially available instruments has been<br />

developed <strong>for</strong> this purpose. For body currents, measurements can be made with simple,<br />

portable laboratory instruments over the frequency range of 0 to about 100 MHz. SAR<br />

can be measured using RF-transparent temperature sensors over the frequency range<br />

of 0 to about 10 GHz. Above this frequency, energy absorption is confined to the surface<br />

of a biological system. Thermographic cameras can be used to measure the surface<br />

SAR up to about 300 GHz.<br />

1.3 Quantities <strong>and</strong> Parameters to be Measured.<br />

For frequencies above 300 MHz, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> measurements per<strong>for</strong>med at distances from the<br />

source greater than a 2 /λ with a probe whose dimensions are much less than a, power<br />

density (W) is usually a meaningful quantity that has been widely adopted as a hazard<br />

indicator (a is the largest dimension of the effective aperture of the source, <strong>and</strong> λ is the<br />

wavelength). However, power density is difficult to determine, except in cases of<br />

stationary, single-component, plane-wave fields of known polarization. In fact, no existing<br />

instrument actually measures power density directly; all measure one or more<br />

3 These frequency limits should not be considered rigid, but are given as a general guide. Normally, a<br />

given instrument does not abruptly become invalid at a specific frequency; rather its accuracy, or<br />

sensitivity, or both, deteriorate over some frequency range until finally it is no longer usable. For example,<br />

an instrument designed <strong>for</strong> the lower frequencies may cover the entire broadcast b<strong>and</strong> down to 0.5 MHz.<br />

One should be aware of the frequency limitations of a given instrument when using it.<br />

Copyright © 1998 IEEE. All rights reserved. This is an unapproved IEEE St<strong>and</strong>ards Draft,<br />

subject to change.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!