The following LPOE Sites did not have cost-effective applications of RE technologies. • Rooseville, MT, • Sumas, WA, • San Luis AZ (not built), • Intl Bridge, MI, • Amb. Bridge, MI, • El Paso, TX (out leased), • McAllen TX (not built), • Admin, TX (leased), • El Paso, TX (leased), • Mataline Falls. WA, • Highgate Springs 1, VT. 154
Table B-19: ROI of RE Solutions by <strong>GSA</strong> Region (without incentives) <strong>GSA</strong> Region 1 2 5 7 8 9 10 Grand Total RE Solutions Case Lifecycle Cost $13,989,463 $23,524,359 $8,871,273 $57,994,499 $10,212,440 $47,714,623 $17,025,517 $179,332,174 Base Case Life-Cycle Cost $14,941,605 $25,004,919 $9,039,609 $63,225,183 $10,683,561 $52,247,654 $17,869,336 $193,011,868 Average Return on investment (%) 10.4% 10.4% 8.2% 13.9% 10.0% 15.0% 11.6% 11.8% Table B-20 offers a snapshot of the number of technologies included in the optimized RE solutions by region and by technology. It is important to understand that for each LPOE site, a technology is only counted here if it is part of the optimized combination of RE solutions for that site. In other words, it is possible for an LPOE site to have the potential to generate biomass energy cost effectively. However, if it is more cost-effective to generate wind energy and use solar water heating at that LPOE site, then biomass energy will not be counted as an optimized technology for that site. Further more, the number of technologies counted in this table does not reflect the total amount of energy that each region has the potential to generate. Table B-20: Number of Technologies Included in Optimized RE Solutions (without incentives) Number of Sites by <strong>GSA</strong> Region RE Technology 1 2 5 7 8 9 10 Grand Total Daylighting 3 4 0 8 1 3 0 19 Wind Energy 28 12 5 4 10 2 11 72 Biomass Energy 22 9 2 26 3 12 8 82 Solar Ventilation Air Preheat 23 9 1 10 4 10 8 65 Solar Water Heating 3 1 0 1 1 2 0 8 Solar Electric Photovoltaics 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Solar Industrial Process Heat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155