Appendices - GSA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Geographical Information System (GIS) Data on Renewable Energy Resources NREL evaluated renewable energy technologies using GIS database of renewable energy resource information (www.nrel.gov/GIS) [ref. 1], to represent the magnitude of a renewable energy resource in the area. NREL Datasets used in the analysis include: • Solar radiation 40x40 km grid • Horizontal, south-facing vertical, tilt=latitude • Wind energy 200mx1000m grid • Biomass resources • Illuminance for daylighting • Temperature and heating degree days • State and utility incentives and utility policy [ref. 6] • Temperature and heating degree day [ref. 1] • City cost adjustments [ref. 7] • Installed hardware costs [ref. 9] • Economic parameters (discount rate, inflation rate) [ref. 2] Information on the renewable energy resources available at each site is listed in Table A-17. 92
Table A-17: RE Resource Information from NREL's GIS System Table A-17: RE Resource Information from NREL’s GIS System LPOE Site Name Heating Degree Days (65F) Cooling Degree Days (65F) Annual Average Solar tilt=lat (kWh/m 2 /day) Wind Power Density 50 m (W/m 2 ) Annual Solar Vent Preheat Delivery (kWh/m 2 /yr) Annual Direct Solar on E/W 1- axis tracker (kWh/m 2 /day) Biomass total residues within 50 miles (tons/yr) Dalton Cache, AK 8,953 0 3.5 155 575 0.0 662 Alcan, AK 12,890 34 3.9 64 728 0.0 238 Skagway, AK 8,953 0 3.5 55 670 0.0 662 Lukeville, AZ 938 4,522 6.6 95 273 5.5 65,343 Nogales, AZ 1,456 3,247 6.5 144 370 5.4 31,369 Sasabe, AZ 938 4,522 6.5 132 332 5.5 47,302 Douglas, AZ 2,380 2,462 6.5 152 411 5.3 28,912 San Luis, AZ 938 4,522 6.5 102 165 5.3 58,144 Naco, AZ 1,456 3,247 6.5 144 370 5.4 31,369 San Luis AZ (not built yet) 938 4,522 6.5 102 165 5.3 58,144 Nogales, AZ 1,456 3,247 6.5 101 357 5.4 44,637 Calexico West, CA 938 4,522 6.5 117 186 5.3 122,194 San Ysidro, CA 1,186 657 5.9 132 145 4.3 0 Andrade, CA 938 4,522 6.5 374 171 5.4 136,890 Otay Mesa, CA 1,186 657 5.9 117 145 4.3 274,453 Tecate, CA 1,186 657 5.9 117 145 4.3 274,453 Calexico, CA 938 4,522 6.5 136 177 5.4 86,732 Eastport, ID 8,068 142 4.4 31 640 3.2 161,925 Porthill, ID 8,068 142 4.3 87 640 3.0 156,636 Ferry Point, ME 9,436 180 4.1 140 588 2.7 363,624 Coburn Gore, ME 7,141 362 4.3 137 597 2.8 949,353 Fort Fairfield, ME 9,436 180 3.9 244 585 2.5 181,984 Houlton, ME 9,436 180 4.2 227 585 2.9 376,179 Jackman, ME 7,141 362 4.1 177 597 2.6 627,773 Limestone, ME 9,436 180 3.8 285 587 2.4 152,040 Orient, ME 9,436 180 4.2 164 585 2.9 472,623 Vanceboro, ME 9,436 180 4.1 174 586 2.7 374,333 VanBuren, ME 9,436 180 4.0 100 587 2.7 128,720 Milltown ME 9,436 180 4.1 140 588 2.7 363,624 St. Francis, ME 9,436 180 4.2 271 649 2.9 236,116 Madawaska, ME 9,436 180 3.9 100 608 2.6 133,883 Fort Kent, ME 9,436 180 4.0 100 608 2.7 173,304 St. Francis, ME 9,436 180 4.0 100 608 2.7 173,304 Detroit Cargo, MI 6,160 792 4.1 192 414 2.4 1,224,450 93
Page 1 and 2:
Appendix A. Detailed Methodology A.
Page 3 and 4:
Initial cost, efficiency, and opera
Page 5 and 6:
Table A-1: Characteristics of Dayli
Page 7 and 8:
Table A-2: Illuminance Information
Page 9 and 10:
Table A-2: Illuminance Information
Page 12 and 13:
Table A-3: Characteristics of Wind
Page 14 and 15: Table A-4: Land Required and Land A
Page 16 and 17: Table A-4: Land Required and Land A
Page 18 and 19: Biomass Energy Biomass energy is fu
Page 20 and 21: Orchard and Grape (Dry Tonnes/Year)
Page 22 and 23: A.2.3.2 Technology Characteristics
Page 24 and 25: three systems and costs are, theref
Page 26 and 27: These systems offer lower electrica
Page 28 and 29: not accounted for in this analysis
Page 30 and 31: Table A-7: Additional Information f
Page 32 and 33: Table A-7: Additional Information f
Page 34 and 35: Solar Resources The solar resource
Page 36 and 37: of the wall admits fresh air withou
Page 38 and 39: The size of a solar ventilation air
Page 40 and 41: Figure A-13: Typical solar water he
Page 42 and 43: Suggested size for the solar water
Page 44 and 45: other with an embedded conductor wi
Page 46 and 47: System efficiency is taken to be 77
Page 48 and 49: Since the system has moving parts,
Page 50 and 51: Table A-13: Location and Size of th
Page 56 and 57: Table A-14: Base Case Electricity C
Page 58 and 59: Table A-14: Base Case Electricity C
Page 60 and 61: Table A-15: Base Case Oil Consumpti
Page 62 and 63: Table A-16: Base Case Natural Gas C
Page 66 and 67: Table A-17: RE Resource Information
Page 68 and 69: Table A-17: RE Resource Information
Page 70 and 71: Table A-18: City Cost Adjustments f
Page 72 and 73: Table A-18: City Cost Adjustments f
Page 74 and 75: Figure A-20: Illustration of the so
Page 76 and 77: Kenneth Ward, WA Blaine, WA Blaine,
Page 78 and 79: Table B-2: RE Use as Percentage of
Page 80 and 81: Table B-2: RE Use as Percentage of
Page 82 and 83: Table B-4: CO 2 Avoided with RE Sol
Page 84 and 85: Table B-4: CO 2 Avoided by Site (wi
Page 86 and 87: B.3 Initial Cost Initial cost of $0
Page 88 and 89: Table B-6: Initial Costs for RE Tec
Page 90 and 91: Table B-6: Initial Costs for RE Tec
Page 92 and 93: Table B-8: Fuel Escalation Rates Us
Page 94 and 95: Table B-10: Life-Cycle Costs for RE
Page 96 and 97: Table B-10: Life-Cycle Costs for RE
Page 98 and 99: Table B-11: RE Solutions that Minim
Page 100 and 101: Table B-11: RE Solutions that Minim
Page 102 and 103: Table B-12: Daylighting Calculation
Page 104 and 105: Table B-12: Daylighting Calculation
Page 106 and 107: Table B-13: Wind Energy Calculation
Page 108 and 109: Table B-13: Wind Energy Calculation
Page 110 and 111: Table B-14: Calculations for Biomas
Page 112 and 113: Table B-14: Calculations for Biomas
Page 114 and 115:
Table B-15: Calculations for Biomas
Page 116 and 117:
Table B-16: Details of Solar Ventil
Page 118 and 119:
Table B-16: Details of Solar Ventil
Page 120 and 121:
Table B-17: Details of Solar Water
Page 122 and 123:
Table B-17: Details of Solar Water
Page 124 and 125:
LPOE Site Name Table B-18: Return o
Page 126 and 127:
The following LPOE Sites did not ha
Page 128 and 129:
Appendix C. Results of Life-Cycle C
Page 130 and 131:
type of arrangement the customer pa
Page 132 and 133:
Table C-1: Initial Cost of RE Techn
Page 134 and 135:
Table C-1: Initial Cost of RE Techn
Page 136 and 137:
Table C-2: Size of RE Technology th
Page 138 and 139:
Table C-2: Size of RE Technology th
Page 140 and 141:
Table C-4: Return on Investment for
Page 142 and 143:
Table C-4: Return on Investment for
Page 144:
[13] Emissions from Integrated MSW
show all

Appendices - GSA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?