Appendices - GSA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table B-4: CO 2 Avoided by Site (without incentives) LPOE Site Name CO 2 prevented from natural gas savings (lbs/yr) CO 2 prevented from electricity saved (lbs) Total CO 2 prevented (lbs/yr) Fort Hancock, TX 16,630 15,183 31,814 El Paso, TX (out leased) 0 -1,435,344 -1,435,344 Juarez-Lincoln, TX -1,933 662,509 660,576 Los Indios, TX -613 338,517 337,904 Laredo TX -507 81,365 80,858 Los Tomates, TX -671 1,497,772 1,497,101 McAllen, TX -272 91,443 91,170 McAllen TX (not built) 0 1 1 Marfa, TX 61,581 280,919 342,501 Kika de la Garza, TX -590 1,122,805 1,122,215 Paso Del Norte, TX -5,589 249,095 243,506 Progreso, TX 21,084 331,540 352,624 Roma, TX 18,971 80,705 99,675 Rio Grande City, TX -1,184 96,411 95,228 Ysleta, TX -4,405 560,715 556,311 RR Inspection, TX -107 7,773 7,666 Admin, TX (leased) 0 1 1 El Paso, TX (leased) 0 0 0 DOT, TX (leased) 47,154 695,143 742,297 Derby Line, VT 10,859 15,485 26,345 Norton, VT 6,288 11,592 17,880 Beebe Plain, VT 2,800 4,801 7,601 Alburg Springs, VT 3,431 5,280 8,710 North Troy VT 7,671 8,067 15,738 West Berkshire,VT 8,006 10,568 18,574 Derby Line, VT 45,016 28,720 73,736 Beecher Falls, VT 13,295 13,020 26,315 Canaan, VT 7,499 6,888 14,387 East Richford, VT 7,898 11,686 19,585 Richford, VT 11,091 10,985 22,076 Alburg, VT (Joint ownership) 5,415 19,426 24,841 Highgate Springs 1, VT 0 1,110 1,110 Highgate Springs 2, VT 34,401 38,153 72,555 Highgate Springs 3, VT 2,298 6,165 8,463 Blaine, WA 69,782 325,436 395,219 Danville, WA 18,730 14,902 33,632 Laurier, WA 9,250 38,620 47,871 Mataline Falls. WA 0 25,480 25,480 112
Table B-4: CO 2 Avoided by Site (without incentives) LPOE Site Name CO 2 prevented from natural gas savings (lbs/yr) CO 2 prevented from electricity saved (lbs) Total CO 2 prevented (lbs/yr) Oroville, WA 6,886 3 6,889 Point Robert, WA 75,940 264,748 340,688 Sumas, WA 0 1 1 Blaine, WA 70,372 216,898 287,270 Blaine, WA -24,453 172,095 147,642 Kenneth Ward, WA -3,910 28,322 24,412 Totals (millions) 3.35 21.03 24.38 113
Page 1 and 2:
Appendix A. Detailed Methodology A.
Page 3 and 4:
Initial cost, efficiency, and opera
Page 5 and 6:
Table A-1: Characteristics of Dayli
Page 7 and 8:
Table A-2: Illuminance Information
Page 9 and 10:
Table A-2: Illuminance Information
Page 12 and 13:
Table A-3: Characteristics of Wind
Page 14 and 15:
Table A-4: Land Required and Land A
Page 16 and 17:
Table A-4: Land Required and Land A
Page 18 and 19:
Biomass Energy Biomass energy is fu
Page 20 and 21:
Orchard and Grape (Dry Tonnes/Year)
Page 22 and 23:
A.2.3.2 Technology Characteristics
Page 24 and 25:
three systems and costs are, theref
Page 26 and 27:
These systems offer lower electrica
Page 28 and 29:
not accounted for in this analysis
Page 30 and 31:
Table A-7: Additional Information f
Page 32 and 33:
Table A-7: Additional Information f
Page 34 and 35: Solar Resources The solar resource
Page 36 and 37: of the wall admits fresh air withou
Page 38 and 39: The size of a solar ventilation air
Page 40 and 41: Figure A-13: Typical solar water he
Page 42 and 43: Suggested size for the solar water
Page 44 and 45: other with an embedded conductor wi
Page 46 and 47: System efficiency is taken to be 77
Page 48 and 49: Since the system has moving parts,
Page 50 and 51: Table A-13: Location and Size of th
Page 56 and 57: Table A-14: Base Case Electricity C
Page 58 and 59: Table A-14: Base Case Electricity C
Page 60 and 61: Table A-15: Base Case Oil Consumpti
Page 62 and 63: Table A-16: Base Case Natural Gas C
Page 64 and 65: Geographical Information System (GI
Page 66 and 67: Table A-17: RE Resource Information
Page 68 and 69: Table A-17: RE Resource Information
Page 70 and 71: Table A-18: City Cost Adjustments f
Page 72 and 73: Table A-18: City Cost Adjustments f
Page 74 and 75: Figure A-20: Illustration of the so
Page 76 and 77: Kenneth Ward, WA Blaine, WA Blaine,
Page 78 and 79: Table B-2: RE Use as Percentage of
Page 80 and 81: Table B-2: RE Use as Percentage of
Page 82 and 83: Table B-4: CO 2 Avoided with RE Sol
Page 86 and 87: B.3 Initial Cost Initial cost of $0
Page 88 and 89: Table B-6: Initial Costs for RE Tec
Page 90 and 91: Table B-6: Initial Costs for RE Tec
Page 92 and 93: Table B-8: Fuel Escalation Rates Us
Page 94 and 95: Table B-10: Life-Cycle Costs for RE
Page 96 and 97: Table B-10: Life-Cycle Costs for RE
Page 98 and 99: Table B-11: RE Solutions that Minim
Page 100 and 101: Table B-11: RE Solutions that Minim
Page 102 and 103: Table B-12: Daylighting Calculation
Page 104 and 105: Table B-12: Daylighting Calculation
Page 106 and 107: Table B-13: Wind Energy Calculation
Page 108 and 109: Table B-13: Wind Energy Calculation
Page 110 and 111: Table B-14: Calculations for Biomas
Page 116 and 117: Table B-16: Details of Solar Ventil
Page 118 and 119: Table B-16: Details of Solar Ventil
Page 120 and 121: Table B-17: Details of Solar Water
Page 122 and 123: Table B-17: Details of Solar Water
Page 124 and 125: LPOE Site Name Table B-18: Return o
Page 126 and 127: The following LPOE Sites did not ha
Page 128 and 129: Appendix C. Results of Life-Cycle C
Page 130 and 131: type of arrangement the customer pa
Page 132 and 133: Table C-1: Initial Cost of RE Techn
Page 134 and 135:
Table C-1: Initial Cost of RE Techn
Page 136 and 137:
Table C-2: Size of RE Technology th
Page 138 and 139:
Table C-2: Size of RE Technology th
Page 140 and 141:
Table C-4: Return on Investment for
Page 142 and 143:
Table C-4: Return on Investment for
Page 144:
[13] Emissions from Integrated MSW
show all

Appendices - GSA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?