Appendices - GSA
Appendices - GSA
Appendices - GSA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table B-10: Life-Cycle Costs for RE Solutions Case, Base Case, and ROI<br />
(without incentives)<br />
Name<br />
Renewable<br />
Energy<br />
Initial Cost<br />
($)<br />
RE Life-<br />
Cycle<br />
O&M<br />
Cost ($)<br />
RE Life-<br />
Cycle<br />
Biomass<br />
Fuel Cost<br />
($)<br />
RE Life-<br />
Cycle Gas<br />
Cost ($)<br />
RE Life-<br />
Cycle<br />
Electric Cost<br />
($)<br />
RE Case<br />
Life-Cycle<br />
Cost ($)<br />
Base Case<br />
Life-Cycle<br />
Cost ($)<br />
Return<br />
on<br />
invest<br />
ment<br />
(%)<br />
Portal, ND $25,714 $0 $0 $73,680 $335,561 $418,026 $421,940 6.4%<br />
Intl Falls, MN $17,592 $0 $0 $87,388 $216,376 $303,514 $305,496 6.0%<br />
Chief Mt, MT $16,780 $0 $0 $469,955 $742,171 $1,140,375 $1,140,633 5.1%<br />
Highgate Springs 1,<br />
VT<br />
$1,911 $23 $0 $2,181 $3,871 $7,486 $6,193 -4.2%<br />
The following ten LPOE sites did not have cost-effective applications of RE<br />
technologies:<br />
• San Luis AZ (not built);<br />
• Amb. Bridge, MI;<br />
• Intl Bridge, MI;<br />
• Rooseville, MT;<br />
• Admin, TX (leased);<br />
• El Paso, TX (out leased);<br />
• McAllen TX (not built);<br />
• Highgate Springs 1, VT;<br />
• Mataline Falls. WA;<br />
• Sumas, WA.<br />
125
Change language